Who is worst at putting guys over? Triple H or The Undertaker?

Question

EVERYONE SAYS THAT TRIPLE H IS THE WOST

I CANT STAND TRIPLE H

BUT THEIR IS A LONG LIST OF GUYS HE HAS PUT OVER

FOR THE UNDERTAKER HIS LIST ISNT SO LONG

SO WHY DO PEOPLE SAY TRIPLE H DOESNT PUT GUYS OVER?

HOW COME PEOPLE DONT KNOCK THE UNDERTAKER FOR NOT PUTTING GUYS OVER?

Answer 1

Because you don't have to beat the Undertaker to be put over... I mean Edge outshined Undertaker by a mile at Summerslam and he was credited for his work.. Now for your question, Triple is worse at putting guys over..

EDIT: Well Taker did too, he lost twice to Batista

EDIT: Yes well if his return match wasn't a squash match then i wouldn't call it burying..

Answer 2

Triple H HANDS DOWN!

Answer 3

I've seen Undertaker job like crazy. He helped put over La Familia, Festus, Mark Henry, Jeff Hardy, John Heidenreich, Brock Lesnar (edit: and a green John Cena)... I could continue.... Who did Triple H help put over? The last time I looked he was busying burying Kenny Dykstra.

EDIT: How about the time that Triple H buried Kendrick & London after a handicap match against Cade & Murdoch?

Answer 4

hhh

Answer 5

Triple H without a doubt is the worst at putting someone over. Granted, he has put people over, but so has The Undertaker.

If I remember correctly though, everytime The Undertaker puts someone over, he doesn't just job, but he makes them look worthy winners. Take a look at Batista vs. Undertaker from Cyber Sunday. Clean win for Batista, and Taker sold his offense well. Taker put over Mark Henry, someone who doesn't even deserve a match on the Wrestlemania card, by makinh him look good in their feud back in 2006.

Triple H loves to bury people, making them look completely useless. Type in Triple H vs. Kane on Raw a few months ago. Kane got completely buried. Triple H vs. Khali, Khali got buried, Taker put him over cleanly.

Those are just a few examples, but a lot of people bash Triple H because of how pathetic he makes his opponents look. Putting over doesn't necessarily mean jobbing, it's supposed to make your opponent seem like a worthy competitor. Edge has been out over by Taker, but Edge was destroyed at GAB by Triple H, that's the difference my friend. I see your point though.

Answer 6

Good question but the difference is, The Undertaker makes whoever he is facing look good in the match where HHH just demolishes them.

I mean, Fair play, HHH put over Batista, Jeff Hardy, John Cena etc

All the main eventers you see today are there because of HHH simple as that but let's face it HHH doesen't lose any matches without outside interferences or DQ, He wins every match now and hardly wrestles on weekly shows.

Undertaker puts someone in the legendary status, Like Edge, After seeing Taker vs Edge at summerslam, You can't really have anything but respect for Edge after that match.

It's like - HHH makes you a main eventer and Taker makes you a legend

Answer 7

triple h...taker has put alot of guys over..edge,batista,khali,

EDIT..hhh did,but taker but batista over at,cyber sunday,survivor..he let khlai beat him..and he put over edge so many times

Answer 8

Triple H

Answer 9

I am done with Triple h he's a stuck up jerk who's only where he is because of his wife!

the Undertaker is a veteran if he thinks someone is ready to get put over then he will put them over

triple H sucks

i know it's a stupid storyline but i take wrestling very seriously and I am still mad at triple h for being a sntich, a stoolpigeon a fink a rat whatever you want to call him  

July 11th Smackdown should have been the best episode in a very long time but no triple cry-baby had to go and ruin it

triple H belongs in some undercard squash match at a house show as a jobber and he should not only not have the title he should also not have any TV time

there was a rumor circulating that Triple H was cheating on Steph McMahon with Christy Hemme... maybe he's s******g around with Candice Michelle i wouldn't be surprised if he is

the fact of the matter is Triple h bought his way into the title and he has screwed Shane McMahon out of his future... before Triple H came along Shane was going to take over Vince's role as Chairman and Steph would have been CEO now however Shane will be lucky to stay in his current job when Vince and Linda decide to call it quits

I respect The Undertaker and Edge a h**l of a lot more than I will ever respect Triple H

and for those of you too young or narrow minded to remember... Triple H was in on the Montreal Screwjob

if i ever had to give Triple H any credit for anything it would be that he was a legitimate friend of Owen Hart's

I know what putting someone over means and Triple H rarely does it the only time he does it is if he's friends with the guy he's putting over or if it's someone in his family and that is not what wrestling should be about

I have to give the Undertaker HUGE kudos for putting Edge over in a phenomenal match at Summerslam however I was slightly irritated that WWE creative dropped the ball again with the rest of the storyline I could have written it so much better if I'd written it there would have been a major catfight outside the cell!

by the way, I don't care if people mark me down for this because I am just being honest

Answer 10

The Undertaker!!

Answer 11

Yes I do know what it mean to put people over, and it is not just losing a match but is also means make an another opponent look good.  Summer Slam Edge even though he lost he still look good because the Undertaker just did not go in and beat him down they made it look like a great match and Edge came out looking better then he went in. another match is Taker and Khali,  how did Khali get over? he beat down the Undertaker but when has HHH made another wrestler look good ?  The only time I really saw HHH put someone over cleanly is when he face the Ultimate Warrior and this was his early years in the WWE and then again the Warrior did not really need to be put over because of his status already.  If you want to see that match go to youtube and then type in HHH VS Ultimate Warrior.