Who thinks WWE has lost brand originality? All 3 r doin a scramble mtch at Unforgiven that was designed 4 RAW?

Question

What do you think Smackdown and ECW should do for Unforgiven in place of a Championship Scramble Match? Tell me who's involved, the stipulation, and who wins. I also want to know who you will think will win each scramble match

Answer 1

it  wasnt  just  desinged  for  raw   it  was   like the  elimination  chamber  an  no  way  out

the  writers  tought  of  all  of  them  doing  the  same  match

Answer 2

Definately. I kind of liked the idea at first when they announced it for RAW, but then Smackdown and ECW did the same thing..

That's THREE twenty minute long matches at ONE PPV..People don't have attention spans like that anymore.

I think for Smackdown, they should have a fatal fourway or a triple threat match or something. Triple H isn't very good at those.

Triple H, Jeff Hardy, MVP, Shelton Benjamin.

ECW should bring back some of it's extreme or change the name.

They should have a cage match with Mark Henry, Tommy Dreamer, Matt Hardy, and Chavo or someone. [ They need more than one heel.]

Whoever gets out of the cage first wins the title.

Answer 3

i was fine with the Raw scramble, but now i think unforgiven is gonna be a complete disappointment unless they throw in undertaker :p

or if randy orton comes back for it

[i have tickets] ;[

Answer 4

The brand is to diluted now between three separate brands.  ECW is by far the worst of the three.

Answer 5

it lost ALL originality.

i used to be a frequent watcher.

now i hate it.

Answer 6

Steven D WWE didn't rip the Scramble from TNA.TNA ripped it off of WWE.Cause WWE did a Championship Scramble at WrestleMania 2000 for the Hardcore title.And now its like all the other brand do what RAW does which sucks for Smackdown and ECW.

Answer 7

It was just a way to make easy matches at the Unforgiven PPV. Since there's only three week between Summerslam & Unforgiven there's not enough time to create new intense feuds, so they just put up some quick matches for the PPV. Afterwards they will start making up new rivalries and stuff.

Answer 8

i personally think WWE is really bollocks, only coz its aload of fake ****

Answer 9

The "Scramble match" was never an original idea as the WWE ripped the stipulation and set up of the match from TNA which was called king of the mountain. As for WWE losing originality all of wrestling has lost orginality, as for a replacement match:

Raw: Three way dance last man standing match between Tommy Dreamer, Mark Henry and Evan Bourne.

Smackdown: 6 man h**l in a cell match between HHH,Undertaker,Edge,Jeff Hardy, Tazz

Answer 10

nothing is exculcive any more ever since the shared paperveiws started last year

Answer 11

i can understand what your saying yet i can also understand why the wwe have decided on doing this. Its because so many wrestlers actually want a chance at some big gold. Plus ecw have only got one title so it makes sense lol :D