Who thinks that circumsission should be banned?

Question

It is a totally barbaric outdated ritual that sometimes goes tragically wrong and parents should be charged for assult

Answer 1

Who's business is it of ours, weather someone is circumsized for religous or medical reasons.

This comes to parents Personal  choice and that is how it should stay, weather you like it or not!

Answer 2

Definitely should be banned for anything other than absolutely necessary medical reasons.

Answer 3

It should be banned as a religious ritual. It should be permitted for medical purposed.

Answer 4

Whether a parent chooses to get their baby circumcised or not is none of your business. Why do you care so much? Is it effecting your d!*k? If it was such a barbaric and outdated ritual, it would not be around today.

Besides, I have heard uncircumcised men complain about how they wish they would have got circumcised when they were little. Most that would want to now that they are older chicken out because of the thought of the pain, etc.

Answer 5

I don't think it should be 'banned'. That would just force it underground. Like so many things which people have tried to ban, control of the process would be lost. Making sure that it was carried out by skilled medical professionals would solve the problem of things going wrong, while not impinging on the rights of certain religious groups. Banning things like that is more "totally barbaric" than civilised control of what is basically a hygiene practice.

Answer 6

There are no good medical reasons to do it.

It does reduce the risk of a urinary infection by 1%, but the procedure itself has a 2% risk of complications.

You are removing the most sensitive part of the p***s.

4 out of 5 women who are exposed to both circumcised and uncircumcised men prefer uncircumcised.

Answer 7

It is an unnecessary procedure on an unwilling participant.

It should be against the law.

Answer 8

For medical purposes circumcision should definitely NOT be banned. There are circumstances where it is a necessity. For religious reasons, I'm not so sure. I know I couldn't have my sons circumsized unless they absolutely needed it. I tend to lean towards it being banned for religious reasons but I just don't know. It's personal choice I suppose. I definitely believe if they're going to do it the child should NOT be awake and able to feel it happening. THATS barbaric.

Answer 9

Agreed. Should not be done until the man legally entitled to make his own decision - at the age of 18, then we will see how many really want their penises mutilating

Yes circumcised me do 'last longer'  - in one case in my experience he was so desensitized that he gave up. So basically his parents decision when he was a baby had already ruined his future s*x life. You can see why religions like this.

Answer 10

Rumour mill has it that circumsized men lasts longer than uncircumsized men. Is that why you're a little closed-minded? Don't know how to vent your frustrations?