Who thinks the all blacks were poisoned before the 1995 world cup final in south africa?

Question

the kiwis claimed they were poisoned.what do you make of it??

Answer 1

Yeah course they were!  Dirty dirty tactics by the South Africans.  All the detractors out there:  Have you read anything other than what the media throws at you?  Try reading 1 of the many biographies out there (i.e. Laurie Mains, Josh Kronfeld, Sean Fitzpatrick) by 1 of the players or coaching staff.  That may give you a better idea of what it was like in S.A. at the time.

Answer 2

That claim always sounded a bit far-fetched to me, but who knows?

Answer 3

die fockers is soos die ozzies. hulle sal enige iets beweer

Answer 4

You are right on the money. that is totally true. you hit the nail on the head.  ouch, that must hurt.

Answer 5

CAn't win world cup,,,,

You must have been born in 1988......

By the way who won the first world cup?

Poison....Sounds a little far fetched....but some people will do anything to win

Answer 6

Never heard that.

Answer 7

No I don't think they were. Though that was quite inventive on their part, don't you think. Sometimes things just go wrong for teams in big tournaments and the grace and professionalism to admit that is more admirable.

Answer 8

Any old excuse for losing. Why do people always have to blame something or somebody when they lose, instead of just that they were outdone by the the other team. Sore Loosers if u ask me.

Answer 9

Totally just an excuse. Nobody ever proved anything, so no they were not poisoned.

Answer 10

1995: poisoned burgers

1999: poisoned escargot

2003: poisoned wallaby steak

2007: poisoned escargot

Conclusion: All Blacks don't have the stomach to win a world cup.

Sorry wadecrptrng, the first two world cups do not count because quoting the full IRB board, "A world cup without the Springboks is not a  legitimate world cup".