Who thought murray played really well against acasuso?

Question

and does anyone think he can maintain a aggressive style of play throughout the tournament coz if he did i think he will do alot of damage. if he plays that passive, unconfident rubbish where he is doin nothin but running around the court then his career i feel will whither away. He has to be aggressive, try to b dominant during rallies in order to win rather than bein passive

Answer 1

If drops a bagel in a straight set match... Yes he played well. Dont know what you mean about him not doing well regularly. He has a 2-1 record over Federer, not much more to hope for in the Federer Era. Know what I mean?

Answer 2

I'm not a fan of his. Nevertheless, his problem is he's just a counter puncher. The only reason Federer lost was he was just diagnosed with Mono. Federer went to the hospital and had to stay there a few days.  The analysis is that Murray will probably wither a bit, maybe like Hewitt's level and just sort of hover around there.

Answer 3

yeah he definitely played really well. Its weird somedays i can like him and other days i cant stand him. The british commentators drive me mad they are sooo biast when murray is playing for e.g Accausso got a great shot but Frew Mcmillan will say ``yeah the wind gave him luck there`` grrr but when Andy gets a good shot its ``wow look at that stunning backhand`` aha Anyway I actually think Murray surprised himself and everyone else lol He leads 2-1 over roger federer thats pretty dam good for the scotsman :) Im scottish so he`s no walkover like Mr Tim !!! It`ll be interesting to see how he plays against baby Nico :) You have to favour the lil spainard :) However with Murray latest form he might just have another surprise in store. One day Murray can play amazing tennis then the next s***w things up.

Vamos Rafa x*x