Who thought that the h**l in a Cell match could've been better?

Question

I thought it was cool. But, I guess nothing will top Mick Foley's performance 10 years ago.

Answer 1

it was a good h**l in a cell match

Answer 2

It was a great match. BUT  THEY SHOULD HAVE WENT ON TOP OF THE CELL !!!  A chokeslam or spear off the cell wouldve defiately put the match on  Foley's performance ten years ago.

Answer 3

It was great but if the match lasted longer it would have been better. I honestly thought they were going to the top when the door got destroyed. The match is MOTY but it would have been better if they went to the top. They could have had Taker chokeslam Edge through the top and have Taker at the top of the cell making the ring burn from there. Still the match was great.

Answer 4

Because of the high risk of injuries, the WWE no longer allows its wrestlers to wrestle on the top of the cell. If you remember the last 2 to do it, were HHH & Jericho in 2002.

Answer 5

It was pretty good, But Please Oh Please, WWE, its time to take it on top of the cell!!!....

Answer 6

It was a very good cell match...it's just that nothing is ever going to top what Foley did. Edge wouldn't jump from the top of the cell...and I think Foley is the only one WWE would've let do that...but that was 10 years ago...

Answer 7

me it could have been better it was pretty slow  

Answer 8

i liked the ending though but i though HHH would come out and fued wit takker. but thats besides the point

that match really wasnt good i was hopin they would go on top of the cell and c**p but it was decent

Answer 9

OF COURSE IT COULD HAVE BEEN BETTER

10 YEARS AGO THAT MATCH WAS ALL ABOUT 2 SPOTS

THE MATCH ITSELF PRETTY MUCH SUCKED

Answer 10

it was awesome but i noticed where taker choke slammed edge thru the mat they never wrestled there the whole match

Answer 11

i loved the end though

Answer 12

well i was hoping for them to go on top of the cell

Answer 13

they didnt even go on top