Who will be better for the world today?

Question

mc cain, with his aggressive, lets attack all enemies style,which may lead to the destruction of this world, or obama, with his more passive, lets negotiate style,which may lead us into slavery.?

Answer 1

Tell you what will be better for the world today? If whichever halfwit is elected to the White House leaves the world alone and starts to tackle the problems in the US of A. And boy have you got problems!!!

Answer 2

Politics is the last refuge of every scoundrel. Don't go by what these candidates for presidency say. These folks are quite deceptive and possess secret agenda which they follow either by their own desire or it is dictated by those who fund their election campaigns.

Answer 3

Draft Paris Hilton to be the president so everyone will have a good time during the the first a few months  at least! Two party election show does not work any more in this country. We need  to go to another extreme to have a dramatic change in order to save this nation if Americans really want to.

Answer 4

mc cain make me think hes got Alzheimer's obama makes me think hes got a dark side to him and there both idiots , the worse of the two is no comparison . were screwed we should vote for the 3rd party if there is one

Answer 5

I figure MCCain will be much more disciplined in his approach than Obama would. Certainly he will make a better President than the incumbent.

Neither will really has a lot of leeway with regard to foreign policy.

The Obama message is essentially all about ill defined 'change'.

I don't want change. Change just means turmoil.

Answer 6

The diplomatic/negotiation style will be far more advantageous.

For one thing, it costs a lot less. The war in Iraq has currently cost more than World War 2, adjusted for inflation. The aggressive style has to continue to expand. The military cannot fight wars on LOTS of fronts all at once! Not even if we drafted everyone between 5 and 90. Military equipment costs a great deal of money.

There are possibilities for uses of various WMD. One of which is a reaction to the massive expenditures on conventional attacks, and the other is lack of resources to conduct such a war. And, the US is no longer the only country on earth with nuclear weapons, nor has it been since the 1950s.

Even so, we've got the Patriot Act, the Emergency War Powers Act. We can be in slavery from the aggressive style just as well. The question is who our masters will be.

Or, we can insist on a government that works through all possibilities of diplomacy, negotiation, and cooperation before it goes to war. That may not work, but it's a possibility to not have slavery.  

Answer 7

It dont matter, either one answers to the worldbank, and would sell their soul and their country to appease The Rothchild dynasty along with the rockerfeller interest on this side of the world.

Answer 8

by default obama---can't have the elderly and disabled scared to death by a government willing to spend trillions on a war yet claims it can't fund social security, Should Russia start WW3 here, then McCain better.