Who will benefit more using our tax dollars? ?

Question

Biden's son Hunter, or Palin's pregnant daughter who is getting married?

Since Palin's daughter is taking full responsibility for what she's done and has decided to get married, it won't cost the tax payers anything.

However, Hunter Biden... Now that is a different story, entirely.

Excerpts:

The Times' report follows several stories this week documenting Hunter Biden's lobbying connections and financial dealings:

-- The Post reported yesterday that as a U.S. senator, Barack Obama sought more than $3.4 million in congressional earmarks, including $192,000 for a suburban Chicago university, for Hunter Biden's clients.

Here's the link, there's WAY too much info to copy and paste:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/washingtonpostinvestigations/2008/08/biden_familys_lobbyist_financi.html

As always, your thoughtful responses are looked forward to.

Answer 1

Obviously politicians. or their brother in-law that works for Big Inc.

Answer 2

Well I guess it will all even out in the end

Bristol will be signing up for WIC so that will surely out weigh those trifling earmarks.........

Answer 3

Yes- The inner-city bozettes on welfare will squander trillions,  

Answer 4

the so-called "have-nots".

Answer 5

I think even if Bristol did not marry - she would be on her father's health insurance plan - she is still considered a minor. At least she isn't living off the system for the baby's pre-natal care. She isn't an illegal which we pay $$$$$ for every day!

And if Obama is like Kwame he is going to tax us to death and make us pay for his lifestyle if he hasn't been doing so already!

Answer 6

She's taken FULL responsibility? Believe me, she doesn't know what that entails.

And McCain is knee deep in political scandal. Let's not go there.

Not to mention, your article proved nothing. You need a better source - not just one small one page "article".

Answer 7

So you think, just because she is getting married it will not cost the tax payers anything huh?

Since when does marriage equate to not costing tax payers anything?

You gotta love those newspapers that use themselves as refrences huh?