Who won July 5 Rampage or Forrest? How?

Question

Give me a lot of details. Not too much.

Answer 1

Can you say search?

http://answers.yahoo.com/search/search_r...

Answer 2

You ever heard the term "Paper Game" in pool or billiards?  That's pretty much all it was, nothing special.

Forrest won by decision.  No serious, serious knock downs.

Answer 3

JFGI

Answer 4

It was a really, really close fight. Rampage definitely inflicted more damage but Forrest was the one always on offense. Forrest won the ground game, easy. Rampage took the first round, 10-9. He dropped Griffin but Forrest threw guard immediately and contained Rmapage, that along with some strikes led to Rampage 10-9 in the first. In the second Forrest hurt Rampage's leg really bad, and was working him on the ground. Rampage didn't do anything that round, Forrest wins that one 10-8. After that, the rounds got really, really close. They were both trading and landing some nice punches and Forrest kept working Rampage's leg with kicks. Rampage took the third round though. He took Griffin down and landed some decent blows, but nothing threatening a stoppage. Rampage takes that round 10-9. The last two were almost completely counterpunching and flurries. I gave the last two rounds to Griffin 10-9 because he was always controlling the octagon, showing more aggression, and throwing more and initiating action while Rampage landed counter shots. I saw the bout 48-46, Griffin. It definitely could have gone either way though. I trust the judges, on account of they're sitting right in front of the cage and nothing else has their attention.

Answer 5

FG WHIPPED HIM--4 OUT OF 5 ROUNDS---RAMPAGE IS PROBALLY ON CRUTCHES STILL---HE TRUELLY KICKED THE LIVING HECK OUT OF HIM--RAMPAGE DIDNT SHOW UP

Answer 6

forrest won by decision but he beat the c**p out of him for 5 rounds

Answer 7

Don't listen to any idiot who says the fight was not close. It was a verrry close fight and both fighters got beat up. If you get technical griffin won the fight easily. He threw more punches, was more aggressive, and had more attempted chokes. But other than the 2nd round his punches were weak, his chokes were not effective(one even led to him being slammed), and rampage nearly always got the better of the exchanges and damaged forest more.

So If you are gauging by damage then rampage was the true winner.

I think the controversial around the fight decision comes from the scoring. Everyone thinks it should have been a draw or the winner should have only won by one point. The problem about that is each round is scored separately so two close rounds could go to one guy and he could win by 2.

This is how i scored if we were basing off of damage and quality over quanitiy.

10-9(ramapage)

8-10(forest)

10-9(close but rampage had the rockers...rampage)

10-9(rampage)

10-10(toss up..wayy to close to call...draw)

48-47 (winner rampage)

but if we get technical..forest easily won

10-9(ramapage)

8-10(forest)

9-10(forest)

10-9(rampage)

9-10(forest)

46-48(winner forrest)