Who would win? Russia vs. USA?

Question

We all know by statistics that the USA is stronger then Russia, but the USA is already in A war against terrorism. And think of Americans fighting in the Russian's land. Horrible. (For statisitcs, google "Globalfirepower")

Answer 1

The Americans fighting on Russian soil will suffer a similar fate like hitler's 3 million guys,the Russians fighting on American soil will need to have a strong navy to supply their forces,so i say the Russian will win

Answer 2

The US wouldn't fight the same kind of war in Russia it's fighting in Iraq.  In fact, it's doubtful they would ever fight each other directly because there wouldn't be a winner.  There'd be a loser and a worse loser.  The whole world would lose.

They might fight wars by proxy, however.  We could see two factions inside one country fighting each other, with Russia supplying one faction and the US supplying the other.

We could see one country molest the ally of the other country as long as that ally is relatively "unimportant" in the international community, which is what Russia has basically done to Georgia.

It's hard to conceive of the two countries actually engaging each other directly though, because nothing good could possibly come of it.

Answer 3

The World will lose, only pathogens and cockroaches would win, but without nukes, probably Russia would win, cuz if US troops go into Russia, they will fall to the Russian Winter, just as French and Germans did in the 19th and 20th century. Lets hope theres no war, ok? :)

Answer 4

Israel

USA will do anything for Israel

http://auif.blogspot.com/2008/08/war-on-...

Answer 5

Well if we fight them it would be a conventional war and we kick butt in those. We are only having trouble right now with our current wars since we don't have a direct enemy. Insurgents don't wear uniforms. If your a soldier in Iraq you don't know who the bag or good guys is for all you know the guy waving and smiling at you could be an insurgent thats actually gonna pop your head off the moment you look the other way.

Basically our troops are doing what police do except criminals here in the US are smart enough not to fu*k around with the police.

Answer 6

no body;it will be full disaster

Answer 7

This question is not any easy one to answer.  Take away the nuclear option and it does not make it any easier.  Technologically the US has the edge, of that there is no doubt, but then you have to take into account the long supply lines needed their forces to be supplied/resupplied.  They have plenty of practise of this as witnessed by the Reforger Exercises of the not too distant past.

This then brings on the next scenario, fighting the Russians on home territory.  Russia is a vast country and as the n***s (and Napoleon) found out "General Winter" is somone that has always been on their side.  Having said that, the technolocical advance in clothing and material reduces that effect but does not eliminate it all together.  The Russian psyche is always the defence of the Rodina (I think Motherland) and as would be the case with the n***s they would be faced with Russians who would quite willingly die to defend their homeland.  It is possible that a war just between these two would leave the US open wide to an attack from another direction.

Answer 8

Russia will win.

Answer 9

COCKROACHES WOULD WIN!!! because they would be the only thing left after we nuke each other

Answer 10

If properly motivated (as we were during both World Wars) The USA has been able to fight a 2 front war and help win both... But we have also lost a 1 front war because our motivation was NOT with the troops, but against the troops and their leadership. We can win a war with Russia if we need to, but we have to want it, otherwise why fight at all?  

Answer 11

In today's nuclear world, there will be no winner.  Both sides realize it would be national suicide to go to war.  In a nuclear world, the only true enemy is war itself....

Answer 12

I'd wager that any conflict we have with Russia in the future will be handled in the same way we did it during the cold war... proxy war after proxy war... I honestly don't see us fighting each other directly, with the exception being maybe some small skirmishes here and there (if even that), as opposed to all-out war.

Both us and the Russians have stockpiles of nukes, and we're both smart enough to know that *no one* really wins a nuclear war.

The Russians backed down from the Cuban Missile Crisis for that same reason, after all... the russkies are agressive, but they aren't fools.

Answer 13

America. Our military power has not been shown in quite a while.

We have been training for conflict in Europe and Russia WW II. Most of our weapons and equipment are for use in a European and Russian environment.

We could easily remove military forces from the Middle East and move them to a European and Russian battle field.

If Russia decided to bring the war to America, then Russia would be defeated in a very short time.

There are several million Veterans and armed civilians that would defend our homeland. And we won't bother with Rules Of Engagement.

Or, we could make the America Bashers happy. We could just let Russia take Europe. Because if we intervene, then we are the villains. If we don't intervene, then are the villains.

If we allow the UN to approve American military assistance against Russian aggression, then there won't be any American assistance, Russia will veto American involvement.

Answer 14

fighting a war against terrorism... jeez.. tht sounds so brainwashed :)