Whos the better footballer between these 2,anderson or freddy adu?

Question

anderson is that 20 yr old kid who played with the Brazil olympic squad.hes a lefty and he has braids.

you already know who freddy adu is.

best answer 10 pts.no bias please.

Answer 1

dude im gonna go with adu hes good and hes got style. anderson is kinda boring to watch

Answer 2

Anderson is a better player...

Anderson is playing a primary role for the European Champion's Manchester United.

Adu just got transfered to Monaco in France, because he couldn't get off the bench in Spain.

Both players are good, but Anderson is playing in a harder league, and playing against better competition every night which will make him a better player.

Check out my soccer blog at http://ilmondodicalcio.blogspot.com

Answer 3

As much as I dislike MU, Anderson is better. He can hold on to the ball.

Adu loses possession half the time he touches it.

Answer 4

It's 2different post so i cnt really compare bt i prefer anderson young talented n he's having great fun with red devils.

Answer 5

2 Different Positions And Players TBH I Haven't Saw Much Of Adu So I Gotta Say Anderson

Answer 6

Definetly Anderson because he is getting good playing minutes in a team like Manchester United. Freddy Adu struggled to get the spot in Benfica and now he's with Monaco (Hope that goes better for U Adu fans). Anderson has shown he has loads of potential, quick, good vision, and a good overall player. I think he will be a very good player for years to come, he's proved some things already, not all the things, but some. He recieved the Golden Ball for the U-17 World Cup in 2005 (even though a lot of people, including myself, thought Giovani Dos Santos deserved it) and he went on to play in Portugal and had good playing minutes. He is just a very well balanced player, overall.

Freddy Adu is a good player, no doubt about it, but he's not something special, he might be to U.S. fans (with all due respect) because there hasn't been a U.S. player (besides Donovan) who looked like he had one of the brightest futures ahead of him. That's what I mean, there's not been someone like this in U.S. Does he have the potential? Yes, but he needs to prove that he has it in him. Not just because of the name he has and all the hype the media has made for him, will he be a good player even without playing. He needs to constantly prove himself so he gets that starting spot in Europe and start getting the experience he needs to become better for his club and National Team. But if he's on the bench constantly, then all that talent we've seen in him so far will go down the drain and sooner or later, be forgotten. He's got talent, he could do good at Monaco, but he needs to give it his all, I know he had a few attitude problems since he was in MLS and he isn't a star, he needs to be humble, get it straight and work your way to the top and become a star, but for now, he's a bench player until he proves himself.

That's my comment on this, so I stay with Anderson.

Answer 7

Adu but he doesnt pass the ball much

Answer 8

freddy adu look at the under 20"s from last year

Answer 9

Anderson although I could do without his ropey hair.

Answer 10

Anderson is world-class. Adu is still a question mark. Wish I was wrong.