Question:

Whose match was better in hamburg, nadal v/s djoker or nadal v/s federer?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

i liked nadal v/s djoker, better in quality, pulsating and exiting, how abt you?

 Tags:

   Report

18 ANSWERS


  1. I would say Nadal vs Djokovic was a better quality match but the Fed Nadal final was a classic. Both were good but I would say Nadal Djokovic.


  2. Rafa-Fed match was just another repeat of their many matches with the same ol' ending.

    Rafa-Djoker match was a lot more different.It was rather unpredictable like Rafa-Fed match.

    Quite honestly Rafa and Fed have dominated men's tennis for way too long that fresh faces to spice things up every now and then are needed..Just for the sake of the game.

    Besides, they both have nothing to prove anymore while Djoker still have a lot to prove.

  3. Nadal vs. Djokovic

  4. .. they were both VERY interesting.. however, i think there were some more spectacular shots at the game nadal-djokovic..

  5. The nadal-djoko game was more exciting!

  6. We often see the best matches in semi-finals.

    So I think Djokeo and Nadal was far far more exciting.

    Some finals are mourneful. Particulary when players have already peaked.

  7. N vs Dj was more exciting and there sure  was some sweeeeet tennis but the other match was pretty good too. a 9.9 for the semifinal match and a 9.7 for the final.

  8. MAD-al v.s fed

  9. I rather enjoyed the Nadal/Djokovic match. That match had much more at stake and eclipsed the final in terms or intensity.

  10. Nole vs. Rafa! It was simply amazing!! The quality of tennis was superb and both players tried so hard. It was much more exciting then the Roger vs. Rafa  match!

  11. the djoko/nadal game was waaay more exciting. it kept me up late at night even if i knew i had to wake up early the next day. nole really put up a fight. At one point i thought that nadal might just lose the match and his ranking. The match was filled with excellent play and winners. It was tennis at its best. The rafa/federer game was a bore. It literally put me to sleep after the 1st set; I had to watch the replay to see what happened in the 3rd set. like what wawrinka lover pointed out the match was filled with too much unforced errors. Nadal was pretty dominant. he just let fed be for a while and then catches up with ease, thanks to the errors of fed. He lost the tie break in the second set but that was it. The better plays of that match was sadly just over-shadowed by the many unforced errors. The fed/rafa game was not even half as exciting as the Nole/rafa game. May be I have just seen to many of these finals. But for me, hands down, the nole/rafa match was THE best match the whole tournament, maybe even the year.

  12. federer/nadal , coz it s a classic  final , anyway roger is the best

  13. For me, the match of rafa and djokovic was much more exciting and thrilling than the final. both were at their best and rafa was amazing, getting shots after shots. also, it was a battle of no2, and you just could feel the vibe and such an important match that kept you to your seat. the final was exciting too, but not as much as the semis.

  14. Nadal vs Djoker

    The style of play was much better and I thought it was overall a much more competitive match.  After Rafa came back in the first set against Roger, I knew Fed was lost.

  15. nadal federer

  16. Definitely the Nadal Djokovic match.

  17. I liked Nadal v/s Djoker.

  18. Well, both interesting, but I'd say Nadal vs. Djokovic.

    Nadal vs. Federer was most of the time a one-way match, you know, Roger dominates then Rafa then Roger..., plus it was full of unforced errors.

    On the other hand, Nadal vs. Djokovic was full of excitement, fantastic points and rallies, in my opinion, it was a really thrilling match.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 18 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions