Question:

Why America is poking its nose in the (democratic) choice of Govt. formation in Pakistan ?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

It's not the general people but the Managers in Oval Office in America ....... !!

They always target a 'soft target', a weak nation, a disturbed state, a poverty ridden nation ...!!

This time they are openly influencing the Govt. formation in Pakistan .. asking the elected groups to hear their dictact .. calling them to their embassy .. !!

May the formation of Govt. be delayed for this ....?

May the insurgents take 'chance' for the delay ....?

May the imperiallist-America delay the good effects of democracy slowly coming back in Pakistan after the election...?

Do America want to see a weak Pakistan ....?

 Tags:

   Report

13 ANSWERS


  1. An example of negotiating between countrys and the way media talks about country and trade and reaction to ones country.I wrote about how abusive  American individual was unrulel ytowards a priminister John Howards and how this individual media person from America could have damaged trade and produce for both country .This individual media person was called an a*****e by myself instead i should have called this person uneducated in the way of financial currency as to destroy media relations of businessman all around the world.The business world cannot support people in the media that destroy the own investmnts.David Harris.


  2. THEY WANT TO TAKE

    CONTROL OF ISLAMIC/

    ATOM BOMBS FOR THEIR

    OWN SECURITY, BY HOOK

    OR CROOK, BY GETTING INTO

    THEIR HOME POLITICAL SCEAN.

    (pAKISTANI).

    THEY ARE THREATENED

    BY ISLAAM.

  3. America is trying to protect Musharaf. They requested the opponent parties to form  government with Musharaf's supported ruling party.

    US is indirectly supporting terrorism. Knowing Osama is in Pakistan they're not interested in getting him. They are just playing the fool on the public.

  4. The US doesn't attack soft nations without cause, they do try to breast feed them to grow up big and strong. I say this firmly because I stand on the shoulders of giants and can see the future of men.

    If no-one keeps an eye on Pakistan, terrorist will try to takeover that nation for their nukes.

  5. Dear, America  is not only poking the nose  but also interfearing  and dictating the terms to the governments in

    asian countries  particularly muslim dominated countries to take a revenge and settle its scores,You are correct the US has targetted  a week nation and made them a disturbed country and poverty ridden nation so that the country will be in their shoes and socks.The US openly influencing the formation of government i,e peoples government in pakistan

    not with any love or affection but with a great intention .The US wants a safe place to safeguard its interest from asia  in particular with communist countries like Chine and USSR. and hence it require a base  for their soldiers and people.That was the intention  thereofe it interfered in the Afghanistan, Pakistan and even in Iraq and iran. But The US intention in Iraq and Iran is differnent .. The US is in badly need of crude oil for their country and their people . Hence they have cleverly advanced their forces towards iran and iraq but not with any good intentions or with love on people of these countries just to acquire the oil easily.  Their base in Pakistan and  Afghanistan  is just to face the  communist coutries   particularly the developed Chine and US foresees  threat from chine to their country. The pakistan martial law will not be that helpful  to US that elected democratic government. Even when Musharaff is there as Head of the state the US was helping  a lot to keep him happy . Definetely the paklistan will have democracy and elected memebers will form the government  just for the sake of US and US will fefineltely intereffre in their day to day activity  for selfish reasons America  wants that Pakistan should be weak  and they should run on the signals of the US.

  6. So you are complaining that our ambassadors want to talk with your elected officials.

    I take it that you have not figured out that this is what diplomats do for a living?

    I suspect that you need to cut down on your caffeine intake and look a little deeper into the claims.  Exactly what has our ambassador said?

  7. Don't blame all of America for that idiot in the White House and his robotic Darth Vader Veep.

    But, we didn't kill Bhutto (I hope) and if we're imperialist, I don't want a trouble spot like Pakistan in it. If I could think of a way to help Pakistan get democracy, I might try it in the United States.

    But in reality, I'd rather we just mostly stayed out of Pakistan's business. On the other hand, Musharaff aside, Pakistan has some pretty trouble people in and near the top of the power pyramid.

    If you're going to have a real democracy, you'll need to retire them and, ideally, put away your bomb making capability and make peace with India once and for all. You both need it -- and between the two of you, the United States wouldn't really want to get involved.

    In fairness you also have to stop playing games in Afghanistan because us aside, it's going to come back and bite you in the bottom.

    A lot of bad leadership doesn't add up like 2+2=4. It's more like 2+2=12 in trouble. So we've had Musho and Busho which equals 20 in trouble.

    Do I want to see a weak Pakistan?

    I don't really give a d**n whether you're weak or not. I'd rather worry about you being richer, better off, healthier, happier, more at peace -- and not at war with your neighbors. Weak or strong doesn't fit. Good and self-reliant is more like it.

    I've been listening to Serbians whine about Kosovo. This is from people who tried to commit genocide there. So no, I don't want a weak Serbia, but a good Serbia.

    Pakistan isn't Serbia, but don't get hung up on weak or strong. The United States would be a whole lot stronger if it just went about its business of doing business and taking care of itself -- with a little real aid instead of loans to buy more weapons.

  8. 1) there are lots of lunatic muslims in that country

    2) it has nukes

    3) Lunatic Muslims want to kill us with nukes

    That makes it very much OUR business.

  9. USA want puppet pakistan government in their hands  so as to dominate Asian countries.

  10. Welcome to the post 9/11 world friend. US has these alleys all over the world whom they desperately need when they are in war with Islamic terrorism. And especially a country like Pakistan which is indeed a nuclear powered Islamic nation with a trouble past, dangerous present and unpredictable future, America need a steady and autocratic govt in Pak. Republican America has always preferred a autocratic Pak. I personally don't think even a change in the Oval office will bring much difference in US' Pak policy. Democracy with all its great virtues, it is nevertheless rather unstable and to force certain govt to make policies in favour of America will take huge time and even there is a possibility it may never passes.(for instance the nuke deal with India, its still under 'red' tape.)America needs  military dictatorship in Pak for its own sake. They want to win war on terrorism. It is rather ironical that the same people who get on the platform everyday and shout their heads off for the democracy are the reason for the death of millions in Pak and in the rest of the world.(As long they are not American who cares, anyway, right?)  

    P.S.- However subcontinent has given new definition to democracy, it is now dynastic constitutional monarchy!

  11. Cause George said so.............!

  12. Autocratic governments are always easier to control for Uncle Sam. Its easier to deal with one person.

    USA doesn't like power in hands of democratic forces in any Islamic country.

  13. without an end there is no beginning

    without a beginning there is no end.

    for everything there is a beginning and for everything there is an end

    life is a cycle

    [p.s.]

    woo-ooh!

    I should have studied politics

    your questions drawn 12 answers so far - really great

    some questions (especially corporates, management, finance don't get even a single answer

    really politics is great

    may be bread for many!

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 13 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.