Question:

Why Does Obama have to Lie about his voting record on BAIPA?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Last Saturday, Obama came on CBN and lied again (even called NRL liers) about his voting record on Born Alive Infant Protection Act. He voted against protecting babies that survived an abortion. This means that his votes were for allowing the baby to die deliberately, which is why opponents term this as infanticide. It would be like standing around and doing nothing for someone who had an accident, got cut and blood is pumping out. Or someone is drowning in a lake and you do nothing. This is why it is called infanticide. But his record is clear, he voted against these intiatives. So why does he lie, and expect to get away with it?

 Tags:

   Report

5 ANSWERS


  1. Sorry Joan S, Binden is a nobody. He isnt going to help one bit.

    Obama will lie his *** off to become president.

    It just goes to show you what you can expect out of the guy.


  2. He is a politician and unfortunately, politicians lie.  He is a very good liar which is bad for the country.

  3. ANOTHER BIG YAWN

    Not at all.  Thanks for the distortion.  The misdirection attempts won't change the fact that Biden will help Obama defeat the GOP.

  4. You are untruthful to your followers about the treatment of babies that survive abortion.

    Shame on the Religious Right for forcing this awful bill on the American people. Obviously, no one has read the bill upon which this bill in ILL is modeled. The intent of the bill is wonderful, but the effects of the bill as written are terrible. No one should have voted for this bill. The intent was to avoid torture of babies that are born alive, but the effect is to force "overkill" of fetuses that "could" be born alive. Prior to this bill the intent of many doctors could have been to make as gentle an abortion as possible and when the abortion failed, to allow the fetus a peaceful death. The bill as written takes away the possibility of using a gentle abortion due to the fact that such an abortion could result in a live birth that would then result in a possible lawsuit for the doctor for failing in his abortion effort. As a result of this bill more aggressive means of abortion must be used to assure the fetus dies.

    Many people such as myself believe the bill could have been written in a much more loving manner and could have allowed the gentle death of fetuses that would die no matter what is done to save them. We have forced our doctors to go from gentle methods to aggressive methods. The religious right should be ashamed of their actions in passing such a cruel bill.

    Another problem with the bill is that if a woman has a miscarriage at home, and is not medically prepared to sustain the life of a miscarriage that is born alive, she can be convicted of murder. This will surely happen should a pro lifer suspect abortion when in fact a miscarriage occurred. Some women will likely be convicted of murder once there is a pro life supreme court.

    This highly morally sounding bill is nothing more than a morsel set out to feed the religious right. It has nothing to do with compassion or common sense.

    It should be noted that most people who read this will have never heard these arguments. And that is exactly the way the pro lifers want it to be. No truth, no honor and no justice is allowed in the abortion debate


  5. Obama lied?  Wow.  How many lies has George Bush & d**k Cheney told the last 8 years?  All politicians lie.  Why is it when Obamam does it the contards moan & groan but when McCain does it, it's different.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 5 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.