Question:

Why McCain can not understand what is hope?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

As I read the news today where Senator McCain present the a critic of the audacity of hope of Senator Obama, THE banality's of his comment. Who have audacity of hope? Those who win to poverty, those that by there self think and act in the possibility that world with out war is possible. If you never been in poverty you just know the power of force.

Why we need to sit in the table of the world? Everybody should know that, we can not impose politic point of view any more. If we want hopelessness economy, that obviously will humiliated all American, that is the track of the race. But if we want a better economy we will need a hybrid car to end the war.

I study one time the psychological cost of not end, a war an Example Vietnam. It will be interesting see the psychological cost of a world that believe that peace in the middle east is possible. Of course for that we need a new car. To'yo?

The violence increase when the oppression increase and the other car belief that you are not honest

 Tags:

   Report

2 ANSWERS


  1. Learn how to write in English before you post another stupid rant.  Good grief!!!!


  2. McCain and the Republicans believe that acting in ones own self-interest, without nuance or apology, always and everywhere eventually leads to the greatest good for the greatest number for the longest time.  In essence: greed is good!  So there is no need for government, because, at best, it siphons off resources that could otherwise go to further enriching the rich with trickle down benefits to the least among us.  At worst, it interferes with the pursuit of profit for the sake of profit.  The only limit to be imposed on one's greed-based actions is one's own morality.  So Enron's Ken Lay can rape California economically and gets a few years in jail, but a poor black man who is accused of rape must be locked up forever, until the DNA test exonerates him.

    Obama and the Democrats understand that it is in man's nature to sin, that greed is a sin, that sin is not good, that to characterize it as such is the work of the devil, and that some humans are immoral and act immorally to exploit the weak, infirm, or confused, irrespective of their upbringing or opportunities.  

    Obama and the Dems believe in a balanced mix of free market and government controls, because without government controls and soley under the influence of unfettered greed, you get the Great Depression (1929-1939) and the Great Dip (2008-?), falling cranes, contaminated food, veterans wandering the streets, polluted lakes and streams, falling bridges, near-misses at overwcrowded airports, and access to quality health care or quality higher education only for the economic elite or those in the middle class who can afford an operation, cancer treatment, or college tuition only by mortgaging the house.

    Now the Dems still haven't figured out what to do about the unions, especially the teacher's unions, who have helped to preserve the status quo of inadequate public schools by protecting bad teachers, or social engineering that forced integration of our public schools that led to white flight and the collapse of the inner city tax base, forced colleges and universities to open up or create women's sports teams or lose federal funding that led to many schools shutting down their athletic programs, and imposed a political correctness of speech that approached that under Marxist regimes.  

    If the Dems can shed those bugaboos, and return to a fair and balanced approach to government involvement in our lives, then the Dems will be the party of the future.  If not, just as Reagan followed Carter, some extremist ex-actor with even more charisma than Obama will follow Obama.  And that will be our end.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 2 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.