How come tax cuts are not followed by actual reduction in government personnel & agencies? Both the Ron Reagan administration & GWB administration seemed to run "slightly" higher debts than say the Jimmy Carter & Bill Clinton administrations.
Of course the Jimma "DA" Carter & slick Willy administrations taxed their constituents till blinder than a bat. NONE of the administrations listed above CUT government personnel & or agencies of the fed.
Why give a tax break then debt spend like it's your last day on earth(GWB)? I mean the constituents have to pick up the tab, WITH INTEREST no less! Why tax constituents blind for a surplus like the Clinton administration, then create more government positions to have to pay for?
Is it that difficult to break out the ball point pen & nix the funding for, say the EPA for the next year? I mean what a savings that would be for the taxpayer!!! Imagine, a whole bureocracy liquidated by the swipe of presidential/house/senate ball points!
Short of the Libertarians are there any other parties SERIOUSLY looking to nix personnel & or agencies/bureocracies???
Tags: