Why are the volunteers from 9/11 being sued?

Question

its gonna be on the news in my area at 10. but i will be sleeping by then. =] anybody got a clue?

Answer 1

Several federal legislators began proposing ways to remove the liability chill from volunteering. On the national level, Congressman John Porter (R-IL) dramatized the problem by assigning bill number 911 to his proposed Volunteer Protection Act. Congressman Porter designed the federal bill to spur state adoption of volunteer protection laws. In 1990, President Bush released a model act and called for state-by-state adoption. In response to these forces, state legislatures began taking action.

Although every state now has a law pertaining specifically to the legal liability of volunteers, the statutes lack uniformity and consistency. In adopting these laws, state legislatures tried to balance the choice of protecting a volunteer from personal liability with assuring compensation to the innocent victim of the volunteer’s negligence.

Only about half the states protect any volunteers other than directors and officers. Moreover, every volunteer protection statute has exceptions. The most common exclusions are those for certain types of conduct, the use of motor vehicles, and federal actions. Most of the laws permit claims based on a volunteer’s willful or wanton misconduct. Several laws also exclude gross negligence or another category of error above negligence.

Answer 2

(((((( No planes crashed into the WTC's on 911 ))))))



It is impossible in the real world for a plane to behave in such manner as per the official account. So long as you continue to deny that one simple concept you will be forever lost in endless pursuit of an answer that will never come.



http://www.metacafe.com/watch/398939/nas...



If one seeks only that evidence which fits the official explanation, then that is what you will find. That’s not science, it’s not objective thinking, it’s not even good common sense.



Contrary to NIST & the US Government, there is overwhelming evidence to conclude that the planes seen on TV were the result of SFX special effects (TV fakery).



Many try to suppress this obvious fact, but to exclude other theories out of hand w/o examination is not only disingenuous, it's straight up denial (a defence mechanism) and only results in a misinformed, skewed opinion.



http://youtube.com/watch?v=NPzz03yzwlY



There were no planes entering the WTC Towers on 911. Perhaps all the related films produced before and since were made to condition the public into acceptance of the official "planes" fantasy. Any discussion of planes on 911, passengers, hijackers, etc. all continue to help keep the fantasy alive.



http://youtube.com/watch?v=QMy34m-qMno



Believing the government’s fairytale of planes colliding with the Towers is the main problem w/ fully understanding 911. The media was broadcasting fake, manipulated images of planes. Superimposing a plane on 911 was done w/ Wescam technology; it provided a single "live" feed from which all the TV networks broadcast. Other videos & images started to appear in the days, weeks & months following 911. All of them have anomalies & impossibilities which can only be explained by excluding planes.



http://youtube.com/watch?v=xpUKwpwSRwc



Real planes would have been a potential liability for the perps on 911. It was easier to control the outcome of the event with much less risk by using the media to broadcast fake imagery. Real jets might miss their targets, get shot down, suffer pilot or computer errors, destroy or prematurely detonate any explosives, passengers could have overtaken the hijackers, and/or the plane might not inflict enough perceived damage to make a collapse believable.



A single fact which cannot be refuted is that a hollow aluminum plane (especially fragile wings) cannot slice through steel beams and concrete without any damage to the plane. News footage showing an airliner gliding into a Tower without any resistance is a cartoon. Aluminum planes are not built for impact and crumple immediately upon contact with solid objects; even a small bird can rip through a jet’s wing.



http://youtube.com/watch?v=MCVwuf_AMFs



Furthermore, a large speeding jet’s vortex trails behind it creating a highly active atmosphere which follows in its path. Had a real plane impacted a WTC Tower, real film footage would have recorded the airliner’s vortex interacting with and violently dissipating the smoke from the alleged crash and the adjacent North Tower. No vortex literally means no planes on 911 (TV fakery).



During the South Tower "impact", fake TV footage shows a WTC Tower sealing itself around the plane during the alleged penetration. Still another too incredible to believe anomaly is the width of the plane’s purported gash didn't match the width of a Boeing 757’s wing span. Another widely publicized video shot by Scott Myers shows the forward fuselage of the "jet" exiting the South Tower, though other shots later reveal no exit hole.



http://youtube.com/watch?v=NCLL6h6-vvc



To consider the media footage showing a plane slicing thru steel and concrete as reality is ludicrous. There were no planes; only spoofed images, manipulated witnesses and falsified evidence. America please wake up; the media was a complicit partner that was in on the crime from the beginning. In fact, the TV psyop 911 couldn't have been pulled off without the mass media’s assistance.



http://youtube.com/watch?v=eoxaU16MntM



Actually "no planes on 911" is the only explanation that makes any sense. There are far too many disturbing questions left unanswered which only TV fakery can address.



Besides all the other impossibilities I mentioned, why are there several "hijackers" still alive; some are even suing the US government to recover their reputation and stolen identity.



Why have so many of the purported plane "victims" not been listed in the Social Security Death Index? ...and their families not claimed their death benefits.



Why are there missing passenger lists and zero so-called Middle Eastern hijacker names on the flight manifest?



Why in the entire history of aviation has a plane never disappeared from a crash - yet on 911, four of them did in a single day? All plane parts are numbered; not one plane part from 911 has been identified by its number.



How could supposedly inexperienced "pilots" who couldn't even fly a Cessna...



* threaten & subdue everyone on board a large airliner

* break into the locked cockpits w/ their hands

* kill all the ex-military pilots and copilots



...then navigate a large Boeing jetliner above the clouds all over several states without airport tower assistance, with nav systems & radios turned off, and fly with pinpoint accuracy into a building that they couldn't even see?



It's common knowledge amongst pilots that a Boeing 757 cannot fly at 500+ MPH at sea level - the air is too thick. That's an airliner's cruising speed attained at high 30,000+ ft. altitudes.



You can call Boeing; even they admit that - and they have been recorded in phone conversations recently saying so.



When an airliner is close to the ground it's either taking off or landing. If forced to throttle to cruising speed at low altitude, it would break apart in mid-air.



http://youtube.com/watch?v=x2upl977dsY



Exposing "no planes on 911" is probably the most important story to people beyond chemtrails, depleted uranium poisoning and nanotech genocide.



Americans are TV hypnotized, drugged up, dumbed down and so utterly dependent that in general they are incapable of critical thought and are disinterested in discovering how the media is adversely affecting their lives.



No planes on 911 and deception by the media is the Holy Grail of 911. It marks the beginning of an Orwellian double-speak mind-set which is now accepted as normal by the populace.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rr2zc7hxa...



No-planes on 911 is highly important as it exposes the real perps behind this mass murder and offers justice to the thousands of people killed that day.



Without the covert deception by the media in collusion with the enemy in control of America’s military intelligence, 911 could not have happened.



The media was directly involved in 911 and together with a criminal government has helped diminish Americans’ freedoms and launch unending wars against innocent nations.



Don't even consider making another comment on 911 till you have watched the "September Clues" video series:

http://www.livevideo.com/video/socialser...



.



P.S. - Please know that I've endured considerable criticism for my conclusions about the 911 atrocity. It is not my wish to disrespect those people who died during the demolitions nor offend their family members. It's my belief that NOT pursuing the real perps responsible, that NOT considering pertinent evidence and NOT speaking out is the greatest dishonor to the victims.



I haven't always thought planes didn't collide with the WTC Towers on 911 - it was a progressive learning curve. I arrived at these conclusions after 6 long years of meticulous research. At first, I actually believed the TV reports and videos showing planes flying into the buildings; I did have reservations though about why anyone would do such a thing.



As I looked at more evidence I came to know the impossibilities of the "official" government 911 report and became aware that the Towers were brought down by demolitions or perhaps some other type of exotic weaponry. I mean, a half million tons of concrete doesn't pulverize in mid-air before ever having hit the ground.



Being the curious individual, I always encountered numerous anomalies about 911 which couldn't be explained by everyday logic or physics. The frustration this caused only compelled me to conduct more and more research.



Once I was exposed to NPT (no plane theory) all these unresolved attributes of the 911 event came into perspective. Suddenly I was confronted with a truth that would seem (to most people) to be so unbelievable that they would dismiss the charge immediately without even considering the evidence.



In the end I really don't care what people think; most are not aware that their view of the world has been constructed for them.



I'm not aligned with any organization, official or otherwise. In all sincerity, I'm just a guy who brings this information to others so that they may use their own common sense and judge the evidence for themselves.



If it makes me look like a nut, then so be it.



.