Why are they giving Gary Glitter the choice?

Question

Now - it's not like I want a dirty pervert like him living anywhere near me - but he obviously does not want to come back to Britain, so he is getting his own way by going to Hong Kong. I think they should send him back to the UK and not give him any protection!! He obviously didn't give the poor defenceless children any choice. What do you think?

Answer 1

It seems rather deja-vu that people are still wondering on this site about this 'glittering' heap of dung. He SHOULD return to England, it is the most sensical thing to do. Does not England have a history of harbouring the world trash???? If he knows what is good for him, he will get back to England, apply and get all the Benefits which befit this half-breed, and be state-sponsored again to repeat all his sickness.

Is this not the way state-sponsored England looks after its own? - it has been sponsoring all European terrorists for decades - why not take 'under its wing' a little bum like this s*****r?

Pleeeeeeeease, people, contribute something that will suit the international scene as news, not just insular, sick little England.  

Answer 2

because his sentence did not include restrictions on what he could do once free

Answer 3

Yes, he should be sent back to the UK.  He shouldn't be allowed to then leave.  He should be monitored and denied internet access.

Answer 4

Okay, this disgusting raping pervert beast does not want to come back to this country. Why? 1.Because he will be hounded forevermore. 2.Because he won't be able to prey on defenceless innocent children as easily as he has done in other countries. So what should happen to him? Bring him back because that's exactly what he doesn't want. Why should he have the choice? He didn't give his victims a choice did he? Hopefully then when he's back and settled, some crazed vigilante will push a fat cactus down his p***s and pour acid on his testicles. Whether it's legal or not get him back. And please, don't anybody try saying that it's an illness because whether it is or isn't, he's an adult and he knows that s*x with children is wrong.

Answer 5

I doubt HK will let him leave the airport. It would be such bad publicity for any country to let him stay.

Answer 6

Some c**p about he has served his time and should be left alone maybe if he was chemically castrated that would be OK.

One thing though at least people will know who he is and can keep theirs kids away from him unlike many other deviates that meld back into society and we will never know who they are until they offend again.

Answer 7

A country deporting him can only demand he leaves their country, and cannot decide which country he goes to.

Vietnam wanted him out, which they have every right to do. But they can't make him come to Britain. After feigning a heart attack, he alighted in Thailand. They could also boot him out, but can't make him come here.

If Britain has a case against him, and he does not come voluntarily, we would have to extradite him, and this is not easy to do.

The idea of bringing him here would be to stop him travelling and being a menace in countries notorious for "s*x tourist" perverts, make him sign the s*x offenders register, and monitor his behaviour and movements, and maybe ban him from the internet.

Answer 8

let him go, i suggest that HK will get shot of him soon enough.  

Answer 9

he wants sending to the electric chair in my opinion??????????only place for fecking perverts like that if you ask me,sorry you did ask didnt you?????????

Answer 10

They are not giving him the choice, correct in that he has been flown to HongKong, but they have barred him from entry and he will be deported back to the UK at the earliest moment.