Ok, so I have no problem with White GSDs as pet quality dogs. I think that they are fine placed in a home as a pet rather than culling the pups at birth. As a companion animal, coat color should have no affect on how they rank as the family pet.
BUT, lets talk working dogs:
A white GSD is not a desirable trait to have in a working shepherd. Here are a few reasons:
http://hometown.aol.com/heisstwessen/page14.html
GSD's are ultimately bred to a working dog standard, correct? If not, they would be in the toy category if they only served as a companion, right? So why would the UKC not find fault in a dog that cannot truly do the job it was bred to do? I read the reason on the WGSD club website and I think its kinda flimsy, but I could be wrong. It ranges from blaming Hitler to claiming that sheep are not white. Seems to play too much with semantics rather than really disputing the converse argument.
http://www.wgsdca.org/thebreed/gsdvswgsd.asp
I don't have anything against a WGSD, or anyone for owning one, but I have to wonder about why a reputable breeder would purposefully breed to yield a white coat when it goes against the job the breed was designed to perform. Its one thing when one is born as a fluke, but another entirely to try for ONLY the white coat. i don't agree with it, personally. I think breed standards exist for good reasons.
Does anyone know why the UKC would accept the WGSD? Is there converse research that would indicate that the white coat is NOT a fault? Preferably research not posted on a pro WGSD page. Something from a neutral source would be great if you have it.
Thanks for the input!
Tags: