I understand that it's tough to build hardware from software, but it's not impossible is it?
My Biology book insists that it is - it doesn't question it at all, doesn't even discuss it: it just STATES that we can't create single-celled organisms.
Now, I know how hard it would be to both reproduce the situations by which life would be created and fully interpret the genome by which you might understand what you'd be creating, exactly, but...
It's all possible, isn't it?
So, the way I see it, I can establish that the conditions you need to create single-celled organisms are possible, albeit extremely tough to make occur - *maybe* impossible at today's level of biology, but, eventually, possible.
I don't understand how one can make the leap from that conclusion to the absolute statement that "Even if we knew the sequences of all of the genes of a single-celled organism and could cause those genes to be expressed in a test tube, we still could not create one of those organisms in the test tube."
Please, someone, explain this to me... It really seems like something I should know. Am I missing something?
Tags: