Why didn't the dems. feel in necessary to fully respond to the attacks on the USS Cole, the first world trade

Question

center attack, and the U.S. embassy in Africa? Would a strong response, instead of basically ignoring them have prevented 9/11 or did the U.S. deserve these attacks?

Answer 1

it's very strange how short bipartisan people's memories are.  People like YOU were unfortunately MORE concerned, as were the republican controlled senate and congressional houses, about monica lewinsky and clinton than the fact that clinton was bombing strongholds in afghanistan throughout his last years in office trying to get osama.  

It appears you learn your history from made for t.v. movies regarding terrorism.  good luck, putz.

Answer 2

Okay, I work in homeland security and I have a real problem with people like you.  

You fail to understand what causes terrorism in the first place.  It is not caused by an unalterable religious predisposition, spawned by a perverted misinterpretation of an ancient article of faith.  Terrorism is the physical manifestation of a climax in emotional frustration regarding either a perceived, or legitimate political grievance.  For al Qaeda it is America stationing troops in Saudi Arabia, supporting Israel, and supporting politically corrupt regimes in the Middle East.  

By invading countries for a terrorist attack you only compound the problem.  The way to fight terrorism is through covert operations and calculated targeting of their leaders, along with a more reasonable foreign policy that respects the political and religious sensitivities of other nations.  

You're running off you mouth with serious implications and accusations regarding Clinton and you're not educated on this subject.

Answer 3

'Deserved these attacks!!!?? Bloody h**l, you really don't have a clue to you?