You get to your late 20s, early 30s perhaps, and you haven't found your soulmate - but you've found someone supportive, basically nice, normal, familiar and safe.
You settle. There are few, or no, sparks, but you settle. He or she doesn't make you feel weightless, but you're getting older, the clock is ticking, the rest of your life is basically in order - job, etc... and you want to start a family.
So you give up on finding the soul mate.
Then you meet him or her.
Do you owe it to someone whom you know is not the love of your life to .... lie to him or her, to continue to tell them they are?
If you're not happy, can he or she be, in the long run?
And why, every time a magazine or on-line outlet puts out an article about "why cheaters cheat" do they center around the person's flaws, insecurities or the marriage itself? Why do they condescend? Why don't any of them ascribe any real meaning to the affair? Why do they assume it is lust, not love?
Once we admit that many people do settle, and we admit that soul mates exist, then it has to be that some people settle before meeting their soul mates.
Is it that the articles are read mainly by aggrieved parties and they need an explanation with them at the center, and that strokes their ego?
Tags: