Question:

Why do Libs say being a governor is less experience for VP than a no-show senator is for POTUS?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

At least she was on the job all of the time.

Lets guess: Alaska (largest state) has less people.

She is a woman.

Executive experience doesn't count.

Because she is prettier than Hillary.

2 years actually doing the job is less than the no show senator.

Because McCain has more experience.

Because Biden has more experience.

Don't worry "liberal" logic should be fun on this question. Just hope they can actually answer.

 Tags:

   Report

7 ANSWERS


  1. LOL libs are starting to worry.


  2. Being a governor for 20 months IS less experience than Obama has.

    Experience aside, this country needs a leader.  Obama  is a leader.

  3. because they are running around like chickens with their head cut off........they are flat out scared......they know that they can't win now

  4. They have to say something negative about Palin until Keith Olbermann comes up with something a little more smeary.

    McCain/Palin  '08  

  5. 1. no senator is on the job all the time.  He was a senator for more than 3 years, deal with it

    2. she served her statehouse for 20 months, he did for 8 years, and yes, he was on the job all the time

    3. There's nothing wrong with governing Alaska, but in a town of 6,500 people you don't exactly get experience to lead a country

    4. Nothing wrong with her being a woman

    5. Executive experience does count, but hers is very limited anyway

    6. Obama was still a part of many bills (he was not a no show), and for that matter served in many of the same kinds of jobs as her, for LONGER.

    7. McCain's the one who's been so adamant about experience being important, odd that he'd choose someone with so little.

    8. I'd love to hear your responses.  I honestly don't think you'll provide any.

  6. The don't even get that Senators and Representative actually go to DC to get money for their home states, which in turn is spent by their respective state governement.

    So, is simply saying she has no experience without really thinking it through that far-fetched for them?

  7. You're being completely irrational here.  Palin has been governor for a little over a year.  Obama was state Senator for eight years and then he's been a U.S senator for the last 2 years.  He has as more experience as Abraham Lincoln did before he took office as president.  And, Obama has more experience than Hillary and Edwards.  And, Obama has experience on the foreign services committee and reaching across the aisle to get work done.  It's obvious that Sarah Palin's experience doesn't even come close to Obama's.

    As far as not showing up to vote, McCain has a very very poor record on average compared to Obama's.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 7 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.