Why do libs say Bush lied about WMD when Russia, <span title="England,France,Germany,Israel">England,France,Germany,Is...</span> and many Democrats also said?

Question

he did? Bill Clinton Hillary John Kerry ted Kennedy Nancy Pelosi. I guess all of these people and countries lied too

Answer 1

Most people do not accuse him of lying about the fact that Iraq may have had WMDs.  What they accuse him of is lying about the true reason we went to war.  

Lots of countries in the world have or are trying to get WMDs.  We don&#039;t use that as a pretext to go to war.

The real reason we went to war in Iraq was to get a foothold in the Middle East to protect the oil supply for our generous people at the oil companies and to get back at Iraq for trying to kill George H W when he was prez.

But Bush know the American people would not fight a war for those reasons.  He used WMDs as his excuse.

Answer 2

Bush didn&#039;t lie, because lying implies that he knew that there were none, but said there were anyways.  Bush just said we did because he actually thought that Iraq did have WMD.  However, he was just simply wrong.  He did not lie.

Answer 3

The United States and the UK, along with other countries and intelligence experts, asserted that Saddam Hussein still possessed large hidden stockpiles of WMD in 2003, and that he must be prevented from building any more. Inspections by the U.N. restarted from November 2002 until March 2003,[1] but hadn&#039;t turned up any evidence of actual WMDs when the United States and the &quot;Coalition of the Willing&quot; invaded Iraq and overthrew Saddam Hussein in March 2003....&quot;Asserted&quot; in spite of evidence and ignoring evidence that was counter to the assertion....how hard is that to understand....look up the downing street memo etc. instaed you rather blame those who trusted the president not to lie....but he did 927 times

Answer 4

And why does every on forget the 2+ years of UN resolutions, sanctions and frustrated UN search teams who were looking and denied by Saddam?

Another consideration was his rape of Kuwait, and using poison gas on his own people.

Answer 5

Good Question. You just forgot one tiny molecular loophole. OBAMA Didn&#039;t vote for it. So since you asked this question you  must care about this issue. Then How is Obama Wrong on this issue? (oh wait lets change the topic to him being a Muslim that will solve it).

I guess you should be voting for Obama.

P.S. If you weren&#039;t asking this question relating to the election I apologize (I thought you where taking that edge). Oh And Don&#039;t forget Canada didn&#039;t get involved (except with some minor exceptions).

Answer 6

He did lie, he&#039;s never stopped lying.  His Inspectors told him there were no WMD, the CIA told him in reports there were No WMD.  Even now he&#039;s saying that the monetary system is safe, and steady.  They have to crush the middle class in both the U.S.A. and the U.K. to achieve their One World Order.

Answer 7

there were no WMDs in iraq even W says it now.

&quot;Saddam Hussein is a man who has told the world he wouldn&#039;t have weapons of mass destruction, and yet he deceived the world. He&#039;s got them... We know he&#039;s got chemical weapons, probably has biological weapons.&quot;

&quot;Saddam Hussein has longstanding, direct and continuing ties to terrorist networks. Senior members of Iraqi intelligence and al Qaeda have met at least eight times since the early 1990s. Iraq has sent bomb-making and document forgery experts to work with al Qaeda. Iraq has also provided al Qaeda with chemical and biological weapons training. And an al Qaeda operative was sent to Iraq several times in the late 1990s for help in acquiring poisons and gases. We also know that Iraq is harboring a terrorist network headed by a senior al Qaeda terrorist planner. This network runs a poison and explosive training camp in northeast Iraq, and many of its leaders are known to be in Baghdad.&quot;

W

in my book that these are lies.