The problem I have with this, is that at the time, the patriots were obviously the better team, yet they still chose to cheat against the jets. There was probably no reason to cheat as you could have probably won the game without cheating. Somehow in the minds of pats fans, the bad guy isn't the one who actually did the deed, but instead the coach of the team that was cheated on. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. I'm not blind to the fact that this practice probably did go on with most teams, but considering mangini previously worked for belicheat, and knew his dirty tricks, don't you think it would have been wise for such a "genious" of a coach not to use dirty tactics such as the video taping?
Someone explain to me how belicheck is innocent in pats fans eyes, you know if it were the other way around, you would never let us jets fans hear the end of it.
Tags: