Question:

Why do people think Bush and the U.S. government planned 9/11?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

There seem to be some people out there that make a ridiculous theory that Bush and the U.S. government planned 9/11. They say they have evidence, but I don't see any reason to believe them.

 Tags:

   Report

20 ANSWERS


  1. Some people are stupid and gullible.


  2. No reason to believe that Bush,Cheney,CIA,military officers planned 9-11?OK smart guy.Just show me one picture of an airplane striking the Pentagon on 9-11.Just one,that's all.It would be impossible for such a large aircraft flown by an inexperienced pilot to crash into the Pentagon at such an angle.If I'm wrong,then show me the pictures.Otherwise you need to back off and do some more thinking.

  3. Basically, three things.

    1. The Bush Administration did nothing to prevent it, even though documented evidence exists indicating they had enough information to be aware something was about to happen.

    2. The Bush Administration did nothing to respond, as illustrated by Mr. Cheney's orders to NORAD to stand down from the response they had already begun.

    3. The Bush Administration, consisting primarily of members of PNAC, used the 9/11 attacks as a springboard to implement their own agenda; the attacks fulfilled thier stated need for a 'Pearl Harbor event'.

    But neither the Bush Administration nor the U.S. government planned the attacks that day, or at least there's no credible evidence to support that theory. The attacks of 9/11 were an entirely predictable and foreseeable response to the tyrannies of the U.S. government in the Middle East leading back at least to Operation Ajax in 1953.

  4. www.zeitgeistmovie.com

    Watch it.

  5. Interesting. Well they may have evidence or they may not. Kind of like when Bush said he had evidence that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.


  6. People love a conspiracy.

    Has Bushco shown any signs in the last seven years of being able to organize ANYTHING?

  7. The Liberals try to blame Mr Bush for the Chicago Fire.Its a matter of just being heard,Empty wagons make the loudest noise,You sound like a very intelligent person,Dont believe everything you hear and only half of what you see,and you will go along way

  8. Wow people, happens to be an area of mine. Bush is just the face. Duh? You know our country, run by the president, no. It is run by people completely hidden above him. If you look at the pure evidence, the lack on the side of 9/11 and other tragic events, and on the contrary the pile leading straight to fact. You are unaware of the effects the media has on the people that listen to it.You are misinformed of actuality, oblivious to common laws of science, and unconsciously being run by your loyal gov't. Do you really not realize what lies in front of you? The New World Order, "sponsoring bombs dropped on our children" for what? Do you know for what?

    Honestly, email me if any of you wish to debate further. I'll lay it in front of you, you can trip over it.

  9. They are mistaken. It was a CIA/Mossad false flag operation. Bush's job that day was to sit in the school in front of the camera then get on AF1 and fly around.

  10. because it has made either a negative or positive reaction in our time..

  11. Because over th past 2 decades, society has been transforming into a "Blame America First" attitude.

    Hopefully that changes in future generations and things go back to personal accountability.

  12. show me the evidence, not this utube c**p

  13. Try watching this PBS Documentary

    "The Man Who Knew"

    about an FBI Agent that was derailed from his investigation that may have prevented 9-11

    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/...

  14. these are the same people that claim Bush is an idiot but in the same sentence will claim the man pulled off the greatest conspiracy known to man

    You can not fix stupid

  15. www.zeitgeistmovie.com

    Here's a conspiracy video. Seems like decent evidence, but its still too unbelievable. Its very entertaining though. The 2nd part is on 9/11, 3rd part is on a suppposed North American Union.

    disregard first part on religion

    Oh yeah and Jerome Corsi, author of the smear book "Obama Nation" supports the 2nd and 3rd theories

  16. I understand...I am not saying I believe this, but it makes sense since we have not fought off terrorism. It was said that Bush didn't PLAN 9/11, but he did know about it. The story, put simply is that Bush told the CIA he wanted to get oil. Which in my opinion is understandable since gas prices are going up and all that. He said he wanted to get it by any means. So the CIA created 9/11 as a plan. Not saying no Arabs were involved in it, but it was all planned. They like the glory. And after 9/11 people say Bush now had an excuse to fight the war...It is very obvious the war wa not on terror, it was on oil.

    Again I'm not syaing I believe this before people give me a thumbs down. But blaming people aren't right. There have been alot of conspiracies in the US government that have not been revealed until years later. I found this article online, but I copied it into a Word document so I apologize because I forgot the website and didn't put it in my favorites:

    ...The government admits that we were LIED to and MANIPULATED to endorse the Iraq War based on false information. This report was released yesterday and is known as "Phase II" into the investigation of the motives for the Iraq War. This article was taken directly from the Sentate's website. Take a second and read it. Be informed because none of the major news stations are covering this story.

    Press Release of Intelligence Committee

    Senate Intelligence Committee Unveils Final Phase II Reports on Prewar Iraq Intelligence

    -- Two Bipartisan Reports Detail Administration Misstatements on Prewar Iraq Intelligence, and Inappropriate Intelligence Activities by Pentagon Policy Office --

    Washington, DC -- The Chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, John D. (Jay) Rockefeller IV, and a bipartisan majority of the Committee (10-5), today unveiled the final two sections of its Phase II report on prewar intelligence. The first report details Administration prewar statements that, on numerous occasions, misrepresented the intelligence and the threat from Iraq. The second report details inappropriate, sensitive intelligence activities conducted by the DoD’s Office of the Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, without the knowledge of the Intelligence Community or the State Department.

    “Before taking the country to war, this Administration owed it to the American people to give them a 100 percent accurate picture of the threat we faced. Unfortunately, our Committee has concluded that the Administration made significant claims that were not supported by the intelligence,” Rockefeller said. “In making the case for war, the Administration repeatedly presented intelligence as fact when in reality it was unsubstantiated, contradicted, or even non-existent. As a result, the American people were led to believe that the threat from Iraq was much greater than actually existed.

    ”

    “It is my belief that the Bush Administration was fixated on Iraq, and used the 9/11 attacks by al Qa’ida as justification for overthrowing Saddam Hussein. To accomplish this, top Administration officials made repeated statements that falsely linked Iraq and al Qa’ida as a single threat and insinuated that Iraq played a role in 9/11. Sadly, the Bush Administration led the nation into war under false pretenses.

    “There is no question we all relied on flawed intelligence. But, there is a fundamental difference between relying on incorrect intelligence and deliberately painting a picture to the American people that you know is not fully accurate.

    “These reports represent the final chapter in our oversight of prewar intelligence. They complete the story of mistakes and failures – both by the Intelligence Community and the Administration – in the lead up to the war. Fundamentally, these reports are about transparency and holding our government accountable, and making sure these mistakes never happen again,” Rockefeller added.

    The Committee’s report cites several conclusions in which the Administration’s public statements were NOT supported by the intelligence.

    They include:

    Ø Statements and implications by the President and Secretary of State suggesting that Iraq and al-Qa’ida had a partnership, or that Iraq had provided al-Qa’ida with weapons training, were not substantiated by the intelligence.

    Ø Statements by the President and the Vice President indicating that Saddam Hussein was prepared to give weapons of mass destruction to terrorist groups for attacks against the United States were contradicted by available intelligence information.

    Ø Statements by President Bush and Vice President Cheney regarding the postwar situation in Iraq, in terms of the political, security, and economic, did not reflect the concerns and uncertainties expressed in the intelligence products.

    Ø Statements by the President and Vice President prior to the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate regarding Iraq’s chemical weapons production capability and activities did not reflect the intelligence community’s uncertainties as to whether such production was ongoing.

    Ø The Secretary of Defense’s statement that the Iraqi government operated underground WMD facilities that were not vulnerable to conventional airstrikes because they were underground and deeply buried was not substantiated by available intelligence information.

    Ø The Intelligence Community did not confirm that Muhammad Atta met an Iraqi intelligence officer in Prague in 2001 as the Vice President repeatedly claimed.

  17. They have trouble believing that terrorists hate us that much.

  18. because there are retards in this world

  19. It could be because he got a memo saying"Ossama determined to strike U.S by high jacking air planes and flying them into buildings.Then instead of warning the airlines and the American people he decided to go play golf and continue  his vacation.

  20. The better question is can you disprove that they did? Right, you can't. So we the people believe that they did because our government can't be trusted they are known to do certain things for their own personal gain, select assassinations come to mind. Bush himself is of questionable character because of the infamous losing of the Ryder truck containing votes and last but not least once a liar and thief always a liar and thief, and furthermore it takes a pretty smart cookie in order to play dumb.

    Answer this one how did he[Bush] get into an esteemed masters' program with a C average?

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 20 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.