Why do some people find it so hard to believe that Bruce Ivins was behind the anthrax attacks?

Question

After all, it was only 5 DAYS before his suicide that the social worker who was giving him psychotherapy put out a restraining order against him and said she was "scared to death" of him. She testified that he had admitted to being responsible for the deaths of 5 PEOPLE and that even during his college years, he had attempted to kill others who crossed him. She also said that forensic psychiatrists who examined his case determined that he was a homicidal psychopath with clear intent. That is to say, he lacked a conscience and had absolutely no qualms about committing murder. If he was indeed a psychopath and he had access to anthrax bacteria, does it really seem so incredible that he was responsible for the anthrax attacks in 2001? Also, shouldn't the mere fact that DNA tests linked the anthrax that was used in the attacks to anthrax Ivins had access to tell us something?

Answer 1

Because the FBI tried to pin this on an innocent man before. I think many Americans feel their government is, in this case, the boy who cried "wolf". I would like to hear what evidence his lawyers claim to have proving his innocence, though, as I was a kid when the anthrax attacks happened. Anybody have a link?

Answer 2

Apparently, there are a lot of holes in the evidence against Ivins.  He may have been a deeply disturbed man, but that doesn't mean he's responsible for the attacks.

Answer 3

Liberals want everyone to think everything is a conspiracy.

Answer 4

Because there is not ONE shred of evidence that he is guilty. You need to research that "DNA" comment you made. It's not the same as DNA in a person. I heard about it on the radio several mornings ago.

I'm "scared to death" of lots of people - that doesn't mean they sent anthrax in the mail.

Answer 5

Because the FBI already tried to pin this on two innocent people and the first was an Arab. We know who the FBI is protecting: Dr. Philip Zack, who was caught on surveillance tape stealing the anthrax.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLE...

http://www.antiwar.com/justin/j022202.ht...

Answer 6

Cuz if U look beyond the tripe being spewed out of the mainstream media, the story doesnt compute. Look up the social worker. She has a criminal record. If it comes down to "he said - she said" then he had much more credibility.

To believe the official tale that the govt & the media are feverishly attempting to sell, one must either be a sheeple or too lazy to look beyond what appears in the MSM.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheeple

Peeps need to wise up to the media. We all know they lie but it might surprise U how bad the problem is. Watch this film about the merger of politics and media as a result of concentration of media ownership. Its called Orwell Rolls in Grave. It will protect you from falling prey to propaganda.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...

Edit.

Some info for U from my recent question about this.

Jean Carol Duley is her name.

Funny thing it seems she might have a criminal past herself directly relevant to her professional life - multiple DUIs. Are we relying on the word of a drunk?

http://www.the-peoples-forum.com/cgi-bin...

Dont believe the source? Look her up in the court files here yourself

http://www.the-peoples-forum.com/cgi-bin...

See a snapshot of the document she filed with the Court. Note the timing!

http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/inq...

Is she even qualified to diagnose mental illness or do her qualifications allow her to provide drug & alcohol advice in Maryland?

Are we letting the govt and the media convince us Ivins was a crazy because Duley said so? Is Duley herself being set up?

http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2008/08/...

This is clearly a frame-up and probably a murder. The crooks behind the attacks needed to close the case. How convenient everything worked out for them.

Answer 7

One isn't "liberal" to believe that 9/11 was an inside job, or the government knew about it ahead of time. That term is poorly used for people who think that being a "conservative" gives them a hidden luxury of being able to cast judgement upon people without even looking for factual evidence presented to them. Also, not all "liberals", as you put it, believe every conspiracy theory that was concocted. However, when it comes to 9-11, there shouldn't be a line separating people in a partisan way. Everyone in America was affected on that day, and it's therefore everyone's responsibility to question the strange coincidences that happened not for their own motives or self gratitude, but in honor of those who lost their lives.  

Answer 8

1.  People know that the Anthrax really came from a government laboratory and not Al-Qaeda.

2.  Steven Hatfill was innocent and yet he was harassed and hounded by the FBI.  He recently won a five million dollar lawsuit over that harassment.

3.  If Bruce Ivins was guilty, why was he allowed to carry on working?

4.  It is Dr Philip Zack that is the main suspect and the FBI just won't touch him.

5.  How can we trust this "social worker" who filed a restraining order?

Answer 9

Same reason people think 9/11 was a inside job and that we never landed on the moon.  People are freaking nuts and refuse to believe anything the government tells us or the fact that the evidence is right before you in your face.  

Answer 10

Because some people are staunch disciples of conspiracy theories. Some I've met are so pathetic that the only possible conspiracy they should believe in was the one that involved that man and that woman conspiring to give them birth.  

Answer 11

People (I) don't believe it because there is no valid evidence to say that he did.  Not any.  If you know of any, adduce it. The manufactured testimony of Jean Carol Duley, given the rottenness of her character and lack of credentials, is something less than worthless.