Why do the Natural Sciences know absolutely nothing of Evolution?

Question

If an experiment is unsuccessful today, why should it have been successful in the past under the same experimental conditions?

Answer 1

Huh?  Scientists in the natural sciences clearly understand evolution.  The ignorance of evolution is in the minds of people who are not scientific.

Answer 2

Evolution IS one of the "natural sciences."

And this question is a meaningless noise.

Answer 3

^see the intelligent, educated answers above^

Answer 4

are you sure the conditions are the same?

Answer 5

It would help a lot if you could fill us in on what kind of "unsuccessful experiment" you are talking about.  Your question is lacking important details.

Answer 6

Blind faith in secular humanism.http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...

Answer 7

I think you are trying to get at that evolution is not testable.

Answer 8

i agree with the 1st answer, If an experiment cannot be replicated to give the same results then the conclusions cannot be accepted.

and the natural sciences do agree with the theory of evolution. Where have you been getting the ideas from that they dont know nothing about the theory?

Answer 9

If a experiment was successful in the past it would be successful today unless on of the facts in the experiment was changed or care was not taken in doing the experiment.  The natural sciences are based on evolution which has been proved by fossil record, genetics, behavior science, and others.  Most use the term theory for evolution in the wrong way as only an idea.  Scientist use theory in evolution as a series of facts that prove evolution has occurred