Why do the au refuse to condemn mugabe for destroying the once richest economy in africa?

Question

Rhodesia 1980 ......the zim dollar is worth the same value of the pound , 2008 1 pound is worth over 100 billion zim dollars ,they used to call rhodesia the breadbasket of africa and look what mugabe has done, why is it in the world that there is not one successfully country run by a black government, is it because of poverty,education,corruption what,why?

Answer 1

The African media portrays Mugabe as a man trying his best, and the farmers as neo-colonials trying to cling on to the old way of life, and that the Western governments are trying their best to discredit Mugabe as the modern day Idi Amin.

I'm sure the truth lies somewhere in between.  

Africans try their best, but the wrong people are in power, and once leaders get into power, it is hard for them to relinguish their leadership. Sharing turns in leading a country is a new concept for many Africans.

Is South Africa, run by a black man, not a successful country? Seychelles? Ghana? I could give you a list of successful countries ruled by Black people.

The World bank and IMF have a lot to answer for, they are responsible for a lot of suffering in Africa.

Answer 2

why dosent the USA go and poke their nose iZimbabwe - there is no oil or Russians there

Answer 3

It wouldn't be politically correct, Rhodesia was under the evil white control.

Answer 4

Mugabe is an anti-colonial idol. Think about it.