I mean you would have thought they need to set a good example and show our justice system is fair especially coming from the line of work they do. As he is proven to be not guilty through the English justice system, surely they should treat him like a man who is innocent, and if anything apologies to the man for keeping him locked up for 8 years, not say they are disappointed that they . To me it seems like the police are saying they are dissapointed that they can't lock up an innocent man... Even if he did do it, the justice system says he is innocent, so surely the police should be treating the situation as them regreting locking up an innocent man, not them annoid that they can't keep an innocent man in jail longer than the 8 years of his life they already have...? The whole thing seems a bit wierd to me, as in it seems the police needed a way out to make themselves look good as it was such a high profile case, and so they've picked the easy target 'local nutter' as no one is going to think this crazy man is innocent. What are your thoughts?
Tags: