Question:

Why does fakederer have such an easy and unfair draw?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

if you don't admit that Roger Federer is not a gentleman who fakes a mono, spits on courts (ew), if not ever then you are in denial, sorry...

 Tags:

   Report

16 ANSWERS


  1. federer isnt a faker so-SHUT UP!!!!!!!


  2. Thats what i've been thinking!!

    And look at Hewitt! He's up against Ferrer(5) in the first round! If that's not conspiracy, I'll shoot myself.

    Bloody h**l ;-((

  3. it may look as if federer  has an easy draw, but he doesn't. if you put smelly nadal and draculic (djokovic looks like Dracula!) in his position those two smelly rats will surely be SWEATING their *** out! especially nadal, who is forever sweating and spitting, even if the match is only starting to begin! federer can beat his opponents without a sweat and a cheating injury timeout. while those two drama queens (nadal & draculic) are always on a DRAMA!

  4. oh.who is ur favrioute tennis player?I thinh he is the one whom has been always defeated by roger.

    if u just read more abour roger you can understand that as others say he is the best in tennis history & it is not important whether his draw is tough or not because he can win everyone.no one is better than him.plz accept that he is gr888888.plz accept it. it is not as hard as u think just watch his matches and see his tactics.

    don't talk like this about No.1 from now on,ok sweeti?

  5. Is there anything easy in a Grand Slam? Only thing is that Federer makes it look easier. Let's accept it!

  6. what are u talking about. Feds 4th round is against bennetau, djoks was against matheiu, and rafas was against verdasco. all pretty avg players, matheius alright but he was never gonna cause an upset. QF ur looking at rafa almagro, yeah thats not gonna happen for almagro, djok vs gulbis, an unseeded player, and fed vs gonzalez - no. 24 who just upset no.9 seed. feds got the hardest there. SF obviously novak and rafa are gonna have 2 battle it out, but djok was on feds side at the aussie open so its only fair. Feds got Ferrer or Stepanek, one whos no.5 in the world- hardly easy, and one who just upset him in rome and is on fire. so its pretty obvious fed doesnt have an easy draw, i think all draws are pretty equal. get the **** over it and stop complaining!!!

  7. It's unfortunate that you feel that way about Roger, but all due respect he actually has a more difficult draw. Djokovic and Nadal's half of draw is actually the easy one in comparison until they meet each other in the semi finals. The only threat to either of them was possibly Nalbandian, and/or James Blake if you even consider him a threat on clay, but both of them lost early. It will be a Djokovic and Nadal semi finals guaranteed now.

    As far as Roger's "easy draw" well Montanes is a very strong clay opponent, and Mario Ancic was arguably one of the best of the unseeded players there likely, only Federer made him look lousy because Federer is simply that outstanding. Federer will also likely play Gonzalez in the QF and Ferrer or Stepanek in the SF. Hardly an easy draw. Federer also had Davydenko and Wawrinka on his side of the draw, and even though they lost Federer still has it quite tough to get to the final with other strong players to "deal with."

  8. I think he does have an easy draw. Everyone who may have taken a set (if that) are out. So it'll just be a cakewalk to the finals I'm afraid. But I think that Djokovic has the easiest up until the semifinal (of course). Who has he played so far? Nobody. I think Nadal has the hardest draw, but he got lucky that Nalbandian got out, if he played to his full potential that would have been an intense match!

  9. Well since he is the best player in the world he is ranked #1 and gets to play #4 in the semis who is far inferior to his level of play as is everyone below #4. The only real competition he has is Nadal and as of late Djchokerquit. If you look at Fed's accomplishments like a normal intelligent tennis fan and enthusiast you wouldn't ask such a foolish question. Federer leads the Djoker 6:2 in head to head. 4:2 on hard, 2:0 on clay, and one of those hard court matches was indoor so 1:0 indoor. And when he finally gets to play Novak on grass he will be leading in that category too. But for that to happen Rafa would have to be out with an injury or Novak would have had to beat Rafa in their semi which I can't see happening since he hasn't ever beat Nadal on clay, grass or indoor.  Well Novak could always drop down to 4th and then play Fed in that semi but why, just to loose to him instead of Nadal?

  10. if you don't admit that Roger Federer is the best tennis player at the moment, if not ever then you are in denial, sorry...

  11. yeah, its kinda easy...for him and go straight to the finals..

    unlike nadal who may encounter djokovic in the SF...

  12. Well, he does have a kind of easy draw... but so do all of the top three. The toughest tests he's had so far are Ancic and Querrey, but its the same for the others. Look at who Nadal has has faced: Nieminen and Verdasco are hardly the most troublesome opponents he could have run into. Djokovic was hardly shaking in his boots when he found out he-d have to face Wayne Odesnik.

    It's just one of those things in tennis. The top seeds get preferential treatment. When Goran Ivanisevic won Wimbledon in 2001, had to face Roddick, Rusedski, Safin, Henman and Rafter in consecutive matches. If he had been ranked #1 instead of #125, that would not have happened. The promoters do not want to see the biggest stars taken out early or run into each other early. That's the point of seeding. Roger's draw, like those of Nadal and Djokovic, is pretty comfortable until late in the tournament.

  13. I've said this several times and I'll just repeat myself. Only the top 3 are good enough players. So, the draw where #3 went into would be the harder draw. The rest (except for the younger chaps who are coming up like gulbis, etc) are not deserving of their rankings. You gotta look no further than #4. He speaks volumes of the sorry state of mens tennis for the past few years. If he were playing in the Sampras era he'd be ranked no higher than 50 or so.

  14. Well I think his sponsors paid the officials to let him have a really easy draw.

    They have been doing that for Federer for about 5 years now.

    He's a very mediocre player but then so was Sampras his dad was paying the chairman of the board.

    I've also heard that Mirka promised to cook a meal for all the linesman if they didn't give Federer any bad calls and let Federer win.

    And as you know she's

    hot stuff' in the kitchen and cooks a mean egg and bacon roll.

  15. luck favors him always

  16. Gee that's the reason Federer has been winning all these 12 grand slams. It's because he had easy draws. It doesn't make sense reasoning with you by saying Federer only APPEARS to have easy draws because he is so much superior to most other players on the tour, because you're way too emotional about this.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 16 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.
Unanswered Questions