Question:

Why does los angeles not have a football team?

by | earlier

Tags:

Report

Answer The Question I've Same Question Too

Sort By: Date | Rating

They had 3.  The Chargers went to San Diego.  Raiders went back to Oakland.  Rams went to St. Louis.  LA didnt support any of them and they all left.

They don't even have an NFL quality stadium now so putting a team there would be a waste of money.  Since they didn't learn the 1st 3 times they lost a team I'm gonna guess a new one would also be poorly supported.
Report (0) (0) |   earlier
The Rams and Raiders were there at one time, but they relocated to St. Louis and Oakland, respectively. The NFL is going to try to get an NFL team in LA within the next few years.
Report (0) (0) | earlier
you guys do, you have USC and UCLA
Report (0) (0) | earlier
Since both teams in LA left, there is little support among the public for a new stadium and no one is interested in playing in any of the existing stadiums. LA doesn't need a sports team as part of it's identity, it does just fine being LA.

Besides, the NFL fans in LA don't have to deal with the NFL's idiotic blackout rules so they get to see the best games every week on TV.
Report (0) (0) | earlier
They used to back in the day but then they moved to Saint Louis
Report (0) (0) | earlier
Used to, but the Rams and the Raiders moved. But from what I have heard, one of the teams in the NFl will be moving there soon.
Report (0) (0) | earlier
They had two and lost them. For some reason LA can't support a team.
Report (0) (0) | earlier