Why does the British High Court now require a disclaimer on an Inconvenient Truth?

Question

According to my source,The British High court now requires a disclaimer stating that the movie is propaganda rather than an actual documentary before it is allowed to be shown to students. Also on Dec 13, 2007, 100 scientists sent a open letter to the UN requesting that the UN cease the man-made global warming hysteria and focus on helping man-kind better prepare for natural disasters. To read this letter and an excellent skeptical paper thoroughly debunking the AGW theory, simply search Middlebury Community Network and in the editorial section click on about global warming. The link to the letter is contained within the document. It is enertaining and convincing reading.

Answer 1

it did not require a disclaimer. it just said that teachers should point out 9 inaccuracy's to students. most of those were minor anyway. the judge also mentioned that the inconvenient truth it a broadly accurate move and it should be shown to students.

Answer 2

I watched about twenty minutes before I started to gag. I was left with the impression that what's really important to Algore IS Algore.

Answer 3

because the author "is" a total butt head and it "is" propaganda..... this d**n  idiot is flying around in his personal leir jet [the audacity of that is just appalling] ...telling you and I to stop using so much energy.. he wants us... and you.. to be sitting in a dark and unheated room...let us all pray for engine failure on take off for this moron, so he can be recycled...Give the "Brits" credit,  apparently they can smell a skunk from a distance...

Answer 4

This is why.

http://www.climatechangefraud.com/conten...

http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images...

Answer 5

There was a lawsuit by someone trying to stop the film from being shown.  He lost, because the judge said the film was basically correct.

The right wing "spin" on this has been shameless.  Read the full decision here:

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admi...

"It is clear that the Defendant understandably formed the view that AIT was an outstanding film, and that schools should be enabled to show it to pupils."

The Middlebury piece was written by a right wing editor of a conservative newspaper.  It is a bunch of long discredited arguments, most refuted here:

http://environment.newscientist.com/chan...

He might want to listen to this, from a far more eminent conservative publication:

"National Review published a cover story calling on conservatives to shake off denial and get into the climate policy debate"

Answer 6

Because no one wants to believe that there's anything wrong with the environment. That would require attempting to cease destroying it.

Answer 7

Now if we could only tag a disclaimer on Al Gore himself!