Why doesn't Wolfowitz just resign as head of the World Bank?

Question

He has already been found to have infringed the boundaries of ethics.

Answer 1

Wlfowitz, being a jew , had succeeded in US occupying Iraq

under false charges and against the wishes of the people of the world.President Bush recommended him for the prestigious post of the President of the World Bank.There he got involved in an anti ethical act of promotion and pay hike

for a muslim woman close to him.

The Ethics committee has found him guilty, yet he has not resigned!

Answer 2

He is thick headed .He should resign soon if he doesn't want to be kicked(literally) out of job

Answer 3

Wolfowitz won't and shouldn't resign because he hasn't done anything wrong.  The "conflict of interest" was pointed out by him despite Riza being 4 reports away from Woflowitz.  He tried to recuse himself from the situation, but the Ethics Board told him that he would have to take care of the situation himself.  Then they suggested he give her a large pay raise to compensate her for the setback in her career at the World Bank.  The issue was brought up twice before, but both times, the Board wrote letters saying he acted appropriately.  To resign now would send the message to the spoiled brats at the World Bank that all you have to do is cry loud enough to get your way.

Answer 4

He has no ethics.  He's a self-serving, weak minded individual, who lacks moral fibre and refuses to take responsibility for his actions.

Perfect for the World Bank then?

Answer 5

Zionists do not want that chair to go away

Answer 6

You have got to be crazy.   Anyone who says this must have just arrived in this world from outer space.

Answer 7

Would you resign to a job that is well paid in and out of office?

Answer 8

he should not as you said and history supports the head man(b they head of country's, banks, arc, U-Way ect) is entitled to  get good sound counseling and recompense is due (unless  "it depends on what is is")