Why don't abstinence-only opponents focus on the eggs that DON'T get fertilized?

Question

Why don't abstinence-only opponents focus on the eggs that DON'T get fertilized?

Answer 1

That if one uses 'potential' as an argument then this should be their stance. And not just used to fodder one side of an argument. Oh yes, that would be nice if people stood by their guns I suppose.

Answer 2

They go straight to h**l!

As do all the unsuccessful spermatozoa!

What's to worry about?

Answer 3

Not a big believer in abstinence only but perhaps because until egg and sperm join, there is no independant genetically distinct living being?

Answer 4

I think JP is on to something - unless I missed something in s*x ed, if the egg isn't fertilized there is something like a zero chance of a separate and distinct being.  

A better question is - why don't they focus on those fertilized eggs that naturally abort?  

I tend to be on the abstinence side of the debate, which is much easier now that I'm married.  It certainly makes things so much easier - no vd, unplanned pregnancies, etc.

Answer 5

Interesting point. These people should be trying to get our conception rate up to 100%. That way, we don't need to have s*x needlessly without producing a child! Wonderful!

And Mr. T T - Yes, these people are for real. Check out Sarah Palin's standpoints on contraception and birth control.

Answer 6

Abstinence only? Are you people for real? This goes against all of our instincts, as human beings. What a joke, Abstinence only. ya right, show me one person who practices this and I'll show you a liar.

I know David, it's just crazy to me. People might think they are practicing Abstinence but humans can only hold out for so long. It's c**p, that's all I'm saying...

Answer 7

idk this is religion here not cooking.