Why don't kucinich,ralph nader, ron paul and mike gravel unite to impeach cheney and bush?

Question

if ur a support of any of these poeple please write to them lets unite and get these guys out of the white house

Answer 1

If you didn't notice, all those people you mentioned are completely irrelevant. Stop dreaming.

Answer 2

Congressman Kucinich has already introduced a resolution in the House of Representatives calling for the impeachment of President Bush. It was referred to the House Judiciary Committee last year. Ralph Nader cannot have any role in any impeachment proceedings because he is not a member of the House of Representatives, the body where all Articles of Impeachment must originate. Mike Gravel cannot have a role because he is a member of the Senate.

Everybody keeps talking impeachment instead of finding out how the process works.

Answer 3

Please note all the fear and smear here...

What does that tell you?

Answer 4

They can't impeach someone that hasn't committed any impeachable offenses and they know it.  Guess they are smarter than most democrats which is saying something.

Answer 5

Impeach of what??

Answer 6

It's probably an impossibility. It requires a majority vote of the House of Representatives to vote impeachment. However, that won't serve to remove them from office. There needs to be a trial before the U.S. Senate and a subsequent vote to convict and remove from office, by that body. The Democrats don't have the 60 votes in the Senate needed to quiet a filibuster, so it's highly doubtful that body would vote to convict. Also, since both Bush and Cheney will be out of office in less than a year, by the time the House and Senate finish with their hearing and voting procedures, much of that year would have been used up. The bottom line is that the effort just isn't worth the time, expense, and subsequent ill will it would create among the participants. We'll just have to let history be the judge and write the final verdict about the record of these two.

Answer 7

The League of Losers? I figure Ralph Nader would be their leaders, he's lost more things than all of them combined.

Answer 8

Because impeachment is reserved specifically for high crimes by the constitution, and so far the nut jobs who are screaming for impeachment have provided NO proof.

Answer 9

ok ?

Answer 10

Still no evidence of a crime!

Answer 11

Kucinich is already trying... RonPaul is the only other one on your list who is currently serving in the House of Reps, and I don't think he'd do it cuz he's libertarian and probably doesn't want to waste the Gov's money on impeachment trials :)

Answer 12

If Bush had declared a war in Iraq & Congress did not approve it, & he went ahead & sent troops to Iraq, then he would have committed a crime.  He has never declared a war, no crime.  The true crime is that he has put this nation in debt to such an extent that no one can see how we can possibly pay it off & Congress has let him do it!