in ref to: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080711/ap_on_re_as/afghanistan
1st Lt. Nathan Perry: "Any loss of innocent life is tragic...I assure you that civilians are never targeted, and that our forces go to great lengths to avoid civilian casualties..."
This makes it all better--that they go to undisclosed "great lengths?" You mean like "surgically striking" instead of "bombing?" The "great lengths" the military goes is in the rhetoric being used by Bush and the Pentagon to hide civilian casualties (e.g., Shock and Awe?). Most Americans feel content with the excuse that if terrorists or insurgents "hide behind civilians" it's perfectly acceptable to blow them all away, but if you saw police doing this in hostage situations in the U.S. it would be a completely different story. The loss of innocent life in the Middle East is labelled "tragic" with some faux moral sentiment and then the next military operation is planned with no responsibility taken by the U.S. as long as it all gets labelled "war." Why don't more Americans care?
Tags: