Why don't you rate the Roos?

Question

I'm sick of all these teams bitching about how they have injuries and blah blah. The Roos have NO full forward, we lost Gibson who was playing full back at the time, and Wells has missed around 6 games. And yet we're still 2nd on the ladder going into the round. We're the last team to beat Geelong and yet no one believes. I just don't get it. Oh, and in terms of facilities, we've got the worst in the league.

Answer 1

I never doubted them. Actually they surprised me being 2nd when i checked because in wa its usually only west coast and freo we hear about. But I watched their game today and they were going really great. I don't even know what facilities teams have so I don't rate teams on that. I havent sed anything about them because no one asked any questions about them. They are going good too. I reckon roos, geelong or west coast will win the Gf this year.

Answer 2

my rating is 7

they lose points for having 50 differnt jumpers per season

Answer 3

dean laidly and the team have done well for the resources they have and if they can finish semi final or higher than they will definatly earn the respect from all those people who for some reason still don't respect them

Answer 4

As you said they're sitting 2nd on the ladder.

I think people do rate them, i know i do. But there is a difference between rating them and talking about them.

Other teams get more coverage ......... why ...... i don't know, but just because they dont get talked about doesn't mean people dont rate them. They are a good team, it's just a pity they aren't talked about the way the powerhouse clubs of the last few seasons are talked about. like the Eagles, and Swans