There seems to be no alternative scientific theory for what else might be causing the majority of current warming other than greenhouse gases. The "it's the sun" argument has been thoroughly debunked. So what's left?
Where are the supposed skeptical scientists we keep hearing about?
What, exactly, is their alternate theory?
Where is the alleged "debate" we keep hearing reference to? Links to papers please...
Science embraces skepticism, but does credible science contrary to AGW theory (documenting in detail any alternative mechanism for current warming) simply not exist?
So having arrived at this point, does continuing to enage with people who are stuck in denial perpetuate the false impression that there's some sort of rational debate involved?
Are we conveying a false impression by appearing to elevate their unfounded beliefs to equal status?
Does our engagement with them make us co-promoters of the disinformation problem?
Tags: