Please Note that I do not glorify nazism or communism but I ask this question to prove a point and hear what most people feel about this,
Hitler and n**i Germany are regarded as the most horrible killing machines to date, but the reality is that more people were killed and starved in Russia under Stalin's rule than in Germany under Hitler's.
Why is it not protected speech to wear a swastika or glorify nazism, but it's okay to wear a Che Guevara shirt, who was a horrible murderer, or a hammer and sickle shirt which represents global opression and starvation.
If a hammer and sickle is acceptable, than a swastika should be an accepted symbol of free speech. And if a swastika is not protected speech than neither should a che guevara or hammer and sickle shirt.
Tags: