Palin has delayed the investigation and hearing into Trooper Gate, when she fired Alaska's Safety Commissioner for not firing her ex-brother-in-law. If she were innocent she would let the process run its own course, but she filed an ethics violation in another department against herself to delay the hearing by tying it up in the another department. Why would she do this if she were innocent? She has a history of trying to fire people who didn't do what wanted when she wanted.
Is she a fascist dictator trying to hide her crimes?
The accusations against her ex brother-in-law Wooten were filed by the Palins, there are no other witnesses. The investigations on the accusations against him turned out to be unsubstantiated. Sounds like a case of "bearing false witness against your neighbor".
Pundants have mentioned her being innocent until proven guilty. But what about Wooten? Those who are quick to defend Palin are quick to find Wooten guilty?
She has a history of firing or trying to fire people who get in her way. Labor activists and management practices use firing someone as a last act of discipline. Transfer, demotion, promotion, suspension, and forced retirement are first options; not firing.
Look at these for more information:
http://news.bostonherald.com/news/2008/v...
http://www.crosscut.com/2008-election/17...
Tags: