Why is a one world order so bad?

Question

it's gonna be a while before i can respond to that

Answer 1

PEOPLE FEAR CHANGE

Answer 2

What the h**l are you asking? You don't seem to be able to articulate yourself in a manner that makes sense.  I think you want to take over the world, but I can figure out what your talking about.

Answer 3

What if that one authority goes corrupt?

Answer 4

Doesn't' surprise me either that you are an Obama supporter.

Edit: Our governments work close together as it is, if you put them closer together you will have more wars as there would be more disputes and people will ultimately break away.

A one world order is not possible, too many different ideas, and people that won't assimulate.

The UN works something like a national gov for the rest of the world anyways, if you go further than that you are going to have to fight a h**l of a lot of people, and would be getting rid of a lot of beliefs, government styles and culture.

If you respond with something like each area can do its own thing...... then why be one gov, if were able to be different might as well as just get along and be seperate governments.

That is my take on it anyways.

There is a balanced in here that you are not seeing. It is one of balancing what you want in a government along with power. The more you add to the club the more dissent you will have. But the smaller you are the less power you will have. Hence the EU formed to help gather more power for all those little European states. Many want to separate, h**l in our history many of the states wanted to separate. It is just part of the balacing act we are doing.

I had fun too