Why is cross-checking so often ignored by referees when even the tiniest hook gets called?

Question

I thought that cross checking was also a penalty. I don't get it.

For example, I thought that Pittsburgh got unfair treatment on their third goal. The Flyers should have had the penalty not the Penguins. (by the way I'm neutral on this one, I'm not a fan or a hater of either team)

Its not just this example though I've been puzzled by that one for years.

Answer 1

Like any other illegal action, lots of crosschecks are missed or overlooked.

Answer 2

The only thing that I can think of is that sometimes it will look like a cross check from up above on the camera level, but actually isn't one if you look at it from ice level.

Answer 3

A hook is everything.  You can give the hardest two-handed slash, break your stick, and you'll get called for hooking... there called, but just as hooks...

Answer 4

It typically takes a person falling down for a crosschecking call to be made.  A hook can be called for even the smallest hold up on the person being touched with a stick.  I think it's okay if the hooks are called, as long as it consistent throughout the whole game.

Answer 5

The biggest reason is because the NHL has put the focus on obstruction type infractions such as hooking and holding.  Another reason is that often times a cross check looks worse than it actually is.

Answer 6

I agree.  I am not sure why Orpik was even in the box when the Cryer hit him.  The calls have been very inconsistent this year.

Answer 7

I think I remember something about having to hit the other player w/ the stick and also full extension of the elbow. Often times it looks like they hit them w/ the stick, but it's really w/ their hands on the stick or it's not a full blow but just a love tap.