Why is it that so many sober and serious scientists, architects, pilots, and others with no axe to grind?

Question

believe that 911 was at least facilitated from some, inside the administration?

These are people with no political axe to grind, and in many cases to their personal disadvantage.

They are from across the political spectrum, so what gives, why would they do this, unless they were sure of their grounds, and believed in being truthful?

Any non abusive answers?

Answer 1

Whenever I ask for the names of these esteemed individuals, here's a sample of what I get:

David Shayler, an alleged British CI officer, a member of the Truth movement and author of the theory that "no planes were involved in 9/11......were missiles surrounded by holograms to look like planes."

James Fetzer, Kennedy assassination left wing theorist who was accused of criminal defamation in his latest attempt to suggest that there was a government cover up of the plane crash that killed Sen Paul Wellstone.

Steven Jones, the author of a book detailing evidence of Christ's visits in ancient America. His "startling" evidence of his conspiracy was debunked by his own colleagues at BYU.

The list goes on - but you get the idea. For what it's worth, none of these theories have been printed in any scientific venue that can be reviewed by their peers, scientists and other real experts.

Unless it is simply to achieve their five minutes of fame or their brains have short circuited, I have no idea what their motive would be in writing these ridiculous accusations.

Answer 2

No links, no sources, no proof just typical liberal conspiracy BS.

Answer 3

Certainly you have references and quotes to give us...  you know, examples of "sober and serious scientists, architects, pilots, and others with no axe to grind" saying that it must have been an inside job...  right?...