Question:

Why is it that under law the unborn child is not regarded as human? Isn't that a bit like Nazism?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

Under this definition there is no distinction about deformities.

 Tags:

   Report

10 ANSWERS


  1. If the child is wanted and the mother is murdered then it is a double murder yet the mother is allowed to murder if it is what she wants.

    h**l in a hand-basket I tell ya.


  2. indeed it is

    i wish abortion were illegal too


  3. If you are trying to justify your anti abortion views, it doesn't wash with me.

    A foetus is not viable until 28 weeks.

  4. An unborn child is recarded as human after a certian period from conception

  5. The n***s paid their people to have pre-marital s*x to populate the n**i race.

    Why didn't you hold Regan, George Sr, and George Jr who promised to end Abortion accountable for what they promised!

  6. I think its stupid.

    If you kill a pregnant woman you get charged with 2 counts of murder.

    So, it doesn't really make sense as to why in other cases they don't consider the child a human.

  7. Good. Otherwise my possible abortion chances would have gone up.

    Some people prefer to abort others or themselves much later in life during bank robberies, road rage, drunken driving, overdosing, etc...

  8. they are regarded as a human being after 20 weeks of pregnancy i think (basically after the time in which the fetus could be aborted has elapsed) Thats true in the UK anyway.

  9. Not really, Under Nazism, a lot of people were not regarded as human even after they were born.  

  10. Well, if you define "human" as a mass of cells without a brain or a beating heart, yeah, the law is *totally* wrong.

    But if you define human like that, you're going to have to include a whole lot of creatures under that definition. A *whole lot*.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 10 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.