Why many Humans thinks 9,11 attack was a completly inside JOB?

Question

please give the evidence which shows that it was an inside job

please brothers and sisters please,please and please

give your answer in points like

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10 in simple english and in simple way dont complicate the things

jesus love all

Answer 1

I never measured my p***s.

Answer 2

This weekend, I saw a book at the library that said this. It was written by a professor of theology. It's titled "Debunking 9/11 Debunking". I read some parts of it, but it made no sense, so I didn't waste much time on it. I don't think there is any evidence of this conspiracy theory. The book referred to articles in "Mechanics Illustrated" magazine. I think this magazine is right, and the theologist is wrong. I'm trying to learn why such a man would lie.

Answer 3

I recently watched "9/11:  In Plane Sight,"  and I'm convinced that the horror of that day was NOT caused by a handful of former goat-herds with box-cutters.  Watch it and see how you feel.  BTW, I don't agree with everything said in this film or on the websites we've all seen.

When I was 10, a much smaller Boeing 727 crashed near O'Hare in Chicago, and I saw the crash site about a week later.  What sticks so strongly in my mind is the memory of (to me) an enormous tail assembly (~20 ft tall) still intact, a huge field of debris made up of seats, luggage, fabric, paper, wiring, insulation, etc, several blackened tubes (fuselage), and the nose assembly.  Supposedly, an huge Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon, left a 16 ft hole, and NO DEBRIS AT ALL!   How is that possible?  

On that awful day, as soon as the networks cut over to the Pentagon, I said to myself, "Where's the airplane?  There's no tail assembly!  Where's the airplane?"  No 757 or any other airliner hit the Pentagon that day.  Of that I'm certain.

Answer 4

There is no evidence that it was an inside job. The points that are generally used by conspiracy theorists are distortions of the truth and can be easily refuted.

Answer 5

I don't think many humans do. Where is the evidence for that conclusion?

Answer 6

There is no evidence of an "inside job". For that matter, the conspiracists can't even decide WHO the "insiders" are/were. Zionists, Bush, NWO, all of the above? But for the heck of it, I'll address Knuxles points.

1) Collapsing matter displaces air. A lot of matter(floors, ceiling, etc) displaces a lot of air. thus the "explosions" mentioned. Simply compressed air pushed out floor by floor. The pattern was consistant for air displaced as the building collapsed, NOT for explosions causing floor by floor collapse.

2)  Proof please? Trying to claim any and all evidence that contradicts your view is faked is simply childish. Examine the evidence on its merits. I've seen 0 evidence this particular video is a fake.

3) What money? Iraq was a kleptocracy with Saddam holding all the money. Sure, we recovered a few billions in cash, which is nothing compared to the expense. Even robbers weigh cost/gain information before attacking. For oil? Maybe, but not in the way you are thinking. Certainly its taken us long enough to "steal" the oil by handing out contracts. You claim we have a conspiracy capable of bringing down WTC and hitting the Pentagon, but incapable of preparing to grab the oil? Also note that we had plenty of reasons for Causus Belli against Iraq without the attacks. So why hurt ourselves economically just to launch an attack on a country that our government never claimed was involved in? That's a conclusion drawn by others and attributed to the administration.

4) HELLO. 1993. Another attempt to bring down WTC. We've known of the interest of muslim militants to attack WTC for well before 1999. The attack pattern is consistant with Al Queda tactics of strikin multiple targets in a short time span. AFTER the fact, we know that the WTC attacks were planned in the late 1990s, but the failure was in putting all the pieces together in time to stop it.  It wasnt as if Al Queada bothered to send their "flight plans"  in advance.

5) Don't know if this is true or not, but so what? Insurance policies are renewed or altered all the time. The fact that it happened within a short time period is coincidence, not evidence of conspiracy.

6) Look at the damage to WTC 7. Of COURSE the roof caved in; support along one entire side of the building was gone, which brought about the collapse. And why bring down WTC 7 as part of the conspiracy anyways? Most people barely noticed its destruction. the symbolism and emotional reaction to 9/11 came from the destruction of WTC 1 and 2. Also, " a sure sign of demolition"? Hmm, funny that we didn't see that on WTC 1 and 2. So now we have multiple forms of demolition? Finally, please note(this applies also to point 1) that demolitions experts start at the ground level, knocking out supports at the base to get the building to collapse straight downwards. Yet conspiracists claim the charges were set at the top, and/or all along the building. Unlike any demolition seen anywhere.

7) Whyt would conspirators convienantly give the media information about a collapse before it happened? Again, I don't know if this is even a factual claim. I DO know however, that that the 20 minute window would be about right for the time frame in which the authorities abandoned WTC 7 and began to announce that they feared the building would fail. So this is a case of distorting evidence.

8) Was it? again, the evidence? More importantly, WHEN was this done, and on what floors? It's not exactly inconsipicous to go about cutting girders, even in the middle of the night. And as pointed out above, the preparations for implosion are done on lower floors, not the top floors where the planes hit. and both buildings definitely collapsed from the top down, not the bottom up.

9) WTC were built to withstand a large plane hitting, yes, but not planes of the size, with the fuel load they were carrying, and most importantly, flying at high speed. Any collision was anticipated to have been lower speed. Check out the formula for how much kinetic energy is generated. Mass is important, but speed is far more so. The difference is not simply doubled by an increase of speed from say 200,,mph to 400mph.  It's exponentially increased. And the collision would have sheered many of the supports, putting more strain on the surviving ones. Add in the fire weakening(no, not melting) the steel, and it makes sense. The second building struck was the first to collapse because the surviving trusses had more weight to support, and thus failed sooner.

10) It's called gravity. The buildings were pulled straight down by gravity. Watch the videos again. one of the two buildings does in fact lean, slightly, but without a lateral push to force it "out", why would it collapse in any direction but downwards? And the buildings weren't reduced to dust by any means. Just look at all the debris hauled away. While a large amount of the buildings were indeed pulverized, to say it "all" was is hyperbole at best.

11) And why wouldnt a building collapsing under its own weight also produce a pyroclastic flow? irrelevent argument

12) Whaa? thermite "in the basement" to "warm up the steel"? As pointed out already, the collapse happened at the top, not the bottom. and thermite would do more than "warm up" steel, if placed in any sane configuration.

13)  First, I dispute that the Americans had anything to do with Lusitania. Certainly no one had any way to predict a U-boat would intercept her. The crew and registry of Lusitania was British. and the sinking still didn't bring the USA into thw war. oops. Second, Pearl Harbor. "Encouraged" the attack? Yes, there was evidence that US intellegence knew something was up, and even that it was going to happen before the end of December. But there is nothing to indicate that anyone put all the intel together to realize that P.H. was going to happen at that time and on that day. If the "US" had wanted to get America involved in WW2 it could have done so by allowing the Japanese to strike, but having "our boys" given enough notice to prepare for the attack. Or do all conspirators automatically prefer excessive bloodshed? But congratulations. The Tonkin Gulf incident is one example you've provided that actually works. But in all of these instances we're talking different generations of American authorities. And with an entire government to choose from, which sections do you tag as responcible?

   Understand this. I'm not saying its impossible for a conspiracy to have taken place. I merely point out that the "official" conspiracy, i.e. Al Queda and 19 arabic men were the conspirators. I've yet to see credible evidence to indicate anyone else was involved, much less WHY they would do such an act. So keep looking, and try not to accept any single source as valid just because it agrees with your own political or ideological leanings

Answer 7

Why should we even try to justify the paranoia of stupid people.  Everyone saw the planes fly into the buildings.... If you try to defend what you saw then you are only raising their opinions to legitimate levels.  Here is an analogy.... How do you know the moon is not made of cheese?  How do you answer that question without giving some credibility to it?  I know 9-11 happened, the world saw it  happen and let the conspiracy idiots hang.  Their hatred outweighs reason.

Answer 8

I do.

If U think you can list the evidence in 10 easy steps, U have much reading to do. 1,000 easy steps would not cover it. Do some reading.

Answer 9

How could it  have been an inside job? There were many witnesses on the airplanes talking about what was happening as it happened.  Too many people were involved. Does the USA have an elite corps of suicide cellphone users, sleeper cells INSIDE the USA to phone their relatives as their planes fly into buildings? Think a little bit, will you?

I doubt if a lot of the so-called info you hear about the buildings being internally mined or whatever is anything more than someone's busy typing. Maybe our Yahoo! Answers typist is copying someone else.

Answer 10

1. explosions came out of the floors below when it was tumbling down, like a controlled demolition (as in, actual explosions. the 'boom' kind.)

2. they faked an Osama Bin Laden video, and made the actor say that he did it (the osama in the confession tape is black.)

3. they wanted to attack Iraq for the oil and money

4. they had warnings as far back as 1999 (that they would fly planes into the towers AND the pentagon.)

5. they had insured two days before the attack

6. WTC7's roof caved in as it went down, a sure sign of a controlled demolition (you can also see, looking closely, the center of the building being demolished. it shoots up, then the building goes down)

7. BBC News here in England had the story of WTC7's collapse...20 odd minutes BEFORE it collapsed (they could also see the tower behind their correspondant. video in sources)

8. the steel framing inside the north and south tower had been cut diagonally, which is what they do in controlled demolition. (there's pictures of it. check them out. in source)

9. the two towers had been built to live through an impact of a plane BIGGER than the two that hit them. (doesn't matter about fuel. this one weighed more without fuel.)

10. the towers wouldn't have fallen down like that. the top part would have fallen off, but they wouldn't have been reduced to dust. (gravity alone wouldn't do this, otherwise buildings wouldn't stand up. these buildings are designed to have massive weight put on them, due to the size.)

(and heres some more)

11. they released a pyroclastic flow while going down. which demolished buildings do. (it should have just gone over, not into itself)

12. there was thermite in the basement to warm up the steel framing to help it go down. (to help the bottom warm up, so it just goes down like nobody's buisness)

13. the americans have done this before.

in WW1 (Lusitania) (if no-one could have predicting a german u-boat intercepting it, why send it in the german controlled waters anyway? during a world war? i'm sure the germans didn't controll ireland)

in WW2 (Pearl Harbor. they encouraged the attacks)

in Vietnam (those two ships (that didn't exist))

and now.

14. only three steel-framed buildings have ever collaped completely due to fire. and all on the same day. september 11th.

15. they managed to recover the hijackers passport. which had survived through an explosion and the building collapsing, and landed on the street UNHARMED.

16. also, the pilot who crashed into the pentagon was highly inexperienced, and could not perform the turn that that plane took.

i could go on and on...

check out my source though. it's good.

and stop giving me negative things. NON of these can be disproved. just try.

Answer 11

1. Thermalite melts steel like a hot knife through butter; it can be made from household materials, the evidence at ground zero shows girders were melted at an angel so the building came down in a controlled footprint.

This is common practice in modern demolition of buildings.  Aviation fuel fire alone cannot melt evenly and localized enough to melt hard steel.

All of the aviation fuel was burned in the first few seconds of the impact in an orange fireball!  Maximum burning temperature: 980 °C (1796 °F) ... Kerosene-type jet fuel (including Jet A and Jet A-1) hardly sufficient to melt steel at melting point of 1500°C

2.   All accounting records of the CIA's black budget (revenue illegal drug trade), and the financial movements of the Federal Reserve and records what of the USA’s gold wealth. This information was kept at the Port Authority building that it was pulled hours after the event of the towers collapse.  It had sustained no damage prior and also came down in a controlled demolition.  Henry Kissinger and Rockefeller’s were involved in a cover up of where all Americas gold went to- all evidence of this corruption was destroyed.

3. This building crumpled with a kink in the middle and even Silverstien referred to the building being pulled in a press interview after the event.  President Bush was told news of the attacks while visiting a UK school- he didn’t even react at this horrendous crime but simply acknowledged it as matter of fact.

4. Silverstein (owner) changed the insurance for the Twin Towers before the attack to include 2 commercial aircraft hitting both towers; the insurance company wouldn't cover it as they said this was impossible!  And he successful sued them for 7billion.

5. Jewish workers were pre warned that it was a bad day to go to works stay at home. (Thanks Mossad intelligence) And in the immediate aftermath strange fluctuations and huge movements of money occurred on the global market, few individuals made a huge killing in the stocks and shares that day!

6. All the steel's in the building was heat protected with asbestos, which resist extreme temperature to 100's of degrees. Seconds before collapse small explosive charges can be witnessed detonating in a pattern around the support columns of both towers.

7. this heat proofing was getting into the air conditioning as particles and the company would have faced huge law suits on health and safely issue- it is carcinogenic (cancer causing). Only one 40,000 of a gram lodged in a mucus membrane (throat or lungs) will lead malignant growth

8. The aircraft could not have been flown with that precision by amateur pilots unless the plains were equipped to fly by wire- remote control, close up video shows the aircraft had some kind of device fitted to the front (under the nose)and were painted mock ups of American Airline’s commercial planes.

9. For the first time is US history Donald Rumsfeld took control of America’s inland airspace and air traffic control was blacked out. This was to run a simulated drill, where all the military’s jets were scrambled 150 miles away to fight a pretend Russian invasion force in Canada, along with some highjackers (played by actors) - somehow this play act went live!

10. The both towers were losing rent money because the 70's design couldn't allow for broadband internet networking as the concrete and steel structure of the towers were hard to penetrate via WiFi, so big business located elsewhere. Which was weird because…

11. Workers and computer technicians reported that weeks before both building had to have their electricity shut off for the nigh (in both towers) t so that the internet could be put in, Witnesses that night saw dozens of Vans drive into the basement and workers in masks and white boiler suits went into the buildings with rolls of electrical cable?  Also office worker at the towers heard the strange movement of heavy objects being moved around on the empty service floors.  Many people in engineers from Pakistan and India have come forward saying they had been paid and flown specially in to do prepare and wire the building for its detonation in the weeks before.

12. Osama Bin Laden is a Family friend of the Bush family and is a construction and demolition specialist in the Middle East, they helped create us military bases, and CIA training facilities in Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia, they also helped the Bush’s oil prospecting company get lucrative deals to drill/find for oil.  It is likely that Bin Laden was part of the plan, and agreed to be a scapegoat in the whole plot – he is hiding in Pakistan Mountains

13. The whole to make American people a paranoid enough fight against the make believe terror threat, allows the US to stave off a recession by gearing up for war. Using the weapons of mass destruction as an excuse it’s easy to go over and steal the oil reserves of Iraq.  As long as it can keep the weapons industry making hard wear the country will not slip into debt, it called ‘war corporatism’.

This is a neo conservative drive; to wage war and control the whole world.  Its run by big corporations, weapons manufacturers, private banks, charities, and corrupted individuals.  It’s the same as the Nazi’s vision of New World Order (NOW) its worse than Fascism Bush even said it himself.  As long as you sit back and do nothing for your fellow man or you rights, you are going to doom humankind to slavery and serfdom of unimaginable evil.

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/66119/war_...

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Odp1FO0Vm...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nD7dbkkB...

http://www.tcforensic.com.au/docs/articl...

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/011...

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/har...

http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com/

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aaron_Russo

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...

Answer 12

It wasn't an inside job it was what we were told it was, terrorists hijacking planes and flying them into the buildings and like many people I saw the second plane hit on live TV.  I have heard the conspiracy theories and nobody has explained what happened to the people on board those planes on 9/11.  I have to wonder if any conspiracy theorist would ever tell Lisa Beamer or any other relative of a passenger on board one of those planes that their loved ones didn't die but were part of some giant government conspiracy.