Question:

Why the UN don't vote a military intervention in Zimbabwe ? Is Mugabe's terror more tolerable than Saddam?

by  |  earlier

0 LIKES UnLike

I am scandalized by the dictature, the terror , that's horrible !

Ok, just think one second !

Imagine your country ( I guess most of you are from the US,right ?) was under a terror rule, a total dictature such as n**i Germany, Saddam's Iraq, Mugabe's Zimbabwe,etc ,..

Imagine you had NO civic rights, NO right for self-expression,...

Imagine your president has all the money and you don't even have something to eat...

Imagine the police entering in your home and robbing you, raping you and killing you because you dared criticize the governement.

WHAT WOULD YOU WANT THEN ?

YOU WOULD WELCOME ANY FOREIGN COUNTRY'S ARMY WHO WOULD SET YOU FREE, RIGHT ?

 Tags:

   Report

5 ANSWERS


  1. According to both the clerk at Brussels & Linguistic in New York is the so called Africa Union > Problem. As we sit and wait > The poverty gap percentage is rising until we find who is financing him then I presume we have to wait if he is going to be at General Assembly.


  2. Without going into any details, let me ask you one thing.

    Do you think the reason why Iraq was attacked, and Sadam was hung was because of the human right ?!

    Honestly the only reason was "WAR ON OIL". in other words, nobody cares for you more than yourself.

  3. As a person who has lived in that country for some years, the reality of Mugabe's terror surpasses anything and everything that Saddam has ever been accussed of. It's in living the reality that one comes to understand and believe that Mugabe has ruled Zimbabwe with an iron fist, with total disregard for his people, has no respect for any other country's opinion and always with the goal of totally destructing the lives of every Zimbabwean. In Zimbabwe, you have no rights (people don't even know what Human Rights means and death is the penalty for self-expression), you have no food, you are stripped of your dignity and you live in constant fear. If one is not murdered or brutally raped / beaten to death, then death is sure to come through hunger. I have always wondered why the rest of world sit by and watch, but I guess they're all waiting until the eleventh hour (and 59 minutes!) before anyone lends a hand. After all, what would the foreign countries gain by helping Zimbabwe since it has nothing to offer in return? If Zimbabwe was an oil producing country, someone would have stepped in to help, years ago. It's SO sad!

  4. I’d say give it some time.

    Even in the case of Saddam Hussein's invasion to Kuwait, it took about 5.5 months before the 1st gulf war brook out. & it took 12 years in which Saddam played cat & mouse game with the UN before America leads its coalition in the 2nd gulf war.

    It took more than 1 year before the NATO forces attack Serbia to resolve the Kosovo crisis. & Kosovo declared its independence only few months ago.

  5. The UN was in Rwanda and did NOTHING as they watched people getting killed with machetes. What do you expect? Africa is full of these types. Today even the AU leader was calling Mugabe a hero. They would cry bloody murder if UN troops invaded and forced new elections.

Question Stats

Latest activity: earlier.
This question has 5 answers.

BECOME A GUIDE

Share your knowledge and help people by answering questions.