Why the rich people not help the poor tp survive in the world?

Question

in india many sufeer financially expecially the christians. once the poor accept Jesus they lose every government benefits. can't we find a solution to this?

Answer 1

Because not everybody need to be rescued... Of course their is inequalities in the world, but if the world was working everywhere the same, the chance of survival of the human race would become very low... Life must be diversified to allow human race to prospere, today the world is working in the west favor, but in the near future maybe the west will collapse and leave the place for others to take... Life is a wheel that turn, maybe in our life time it will not be our turn, but the wheel continue to turn...

Answer 2

thats india for ya.

Answer 3

It would be better not to mention class and cast in your thoughts.

If the rich help the poor than what the poors will do.

As the markets exist due to customers, the nations exist due to people in it, the leaders exist due to the people they lead, the rich exist due to people not so rich.

This segregation in the society helps it to exist and thrive. One trying to go step ahead of him/her. This is the driving force of the social order and was there centuries ago and will be there for centuries to come. The only difference would be the distance or the gap that may narrow down but still the order would remain because the social system has to remain for us to thrive on the opportunities ahead of us.

Answer 4

Why should we help! It's none of my buisness, I'm not responcible for some one I don't know or haven't even seen!

Answer 5

so this government takes financial assistance away because of religion?

Answer 6

First you have to look at what is rich and what is poor. Money doesn't feed clothe or shelter people, but food clothes and houses do. Its about an inequality of trade. A rich person pays a poor person x amount of dollars to build his house, yet the poor person can't build a house for the same amount. If the rich people sudenly gave(or their money was taken) all their money to the poor, you would have what is called inflation, and the poor people would still be without the esentials of life, because the no one would build their houses for worthless pieces of paper.

I can't speak for India, because they have a caste system and religious intolorence it sounds like from your question, but in the US, the main problem is there are to many poor people. People that could work, could support themselves, that sap the resources of those truely in need.

Answer 7

Firstly, the there is no end to the problem. when there are rich ppl there must be poor ppl. Its like a north must have a south(i got that from somewhere). You cannot eliminate the problem.

Just imagine, even if the rich really and i mean REALLY donate money to the poor. What would happen then? most of the people would still end up poor. They would not know what to do with the money and instead be forever dependant on money from generous people. That is why begging is banned in some countries.. But yes u have a point. Religion aside, there would still be people who are reluctant to share their wealth. *peace*

Answer 8

Firstly, you are full of lies.

You could always be a christian inwardly and offisially be whatever benefits you.

Answer 9

WE could probably find a solution, but what good would that do, there is , has and always will be a caste system in India, it is their culture, highly unlikely they will change it

Answer 10

In America they do, just not enough!

Answer 11

whenever money increases the warry will be increase too.In Islam any money you get you have pay a rate bet. 2.5 - 20% to poor people .If every body did that there are no poor and no multy miliarder.

Answer 12

Some rich people, don't want to spend their money.  A lot of rich people, want to save their money and never stop.

Answer 13

Where's Ghandi when you need him?

Answer 14

Actually the rich donate far more to Charity & people in need than most acknowledge.  Religions in general tend to discriminate against other minority religions & if they are not out right hostile to them, at least deny them needed assistance.

Contrary to a previous posters comments Islam is the   biggest offender here.  The "Dhimmi" a non Muslim living in a country under Sharia law, has few rights other than the right to exist if he offends no follower of Mohammad. The Dhimmi leads a wretched life under the thumb of most Islamic masters.

India of course is another place with an extreme amount of religious intollerance & today some of that is being directed toward castes that attempt to escape discrimination by changing their religion. They are in a transition period much like that in the US during the 50s & 60s.  Education should eventually change the situation in India... but it will be a rough ride.

Protestants & Catholics are slowly begining to stop hating and killing each other... although they still don't trust the other camp.