I have read a lot of the arguments to and for the Lisbon treaty -
The no voters claim that Ireland's corporate tax will be increased but this isn't the case. For this to happen it will require unanimous verdict from all EU states, if Ireland objects it won't happen (http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=zPn8-elwL0k&feature=related).
No campaigners are convinced that each treaty leads inevitably to militarisation. This is taken from the "The State (Ireland) shall not adopt a decision taken by the European Council to establish a common defence . . . where that common defence would involved the State (of Ireland)." Also, the "triple lock" mechanism of all Irish military operations - the UN, the Government and the Dáil all remain in place. Very little is changing in regards to Ireland's neutrality. For offensive military action Ireland shall keep its veto within the EU.
I welcome anyone to dispute these points or add a few more I might have missed on. The more diversity the better =)
Tags: