Why was Olympic tennis coverage so sparse?

Question

With Mary Carillo as the #2 announcer to Bob Costas I expected more, but they barely even mentioned any results even with James Blake beating Federer to go to the Semifinals.

Answer 1

because you can see it on tv anytime

Answer 2

because tennis is a boring game to watch.

Answer 3

they are too busy on phelps' nuts

Answer 4

I agree with trekker. By anytime, I mean several times per year, even without cable. h**l, we just endured two weeks of Wimbledon, when all I care about is the final match. And I think the U.S. Open is right around the corner. The French Open before Wimbledon. Right? It's old news. The other events are once every 4 years, and most people don't care about the World Championships every year. For some reason, the Olympics are more popular. Not sure why. That might be a good Q to ask. Think I will.

Answer 5

it's because channel 7 focus on the Aussies every single second of the day